Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Dudoight

Hate to rain on everyone’s parade, but did anyone notice the BAC. .02. .02 is not impaired. You may call that a “technicality” but there it is. Being up all night, I would bet he fell asleep. You may want someone convicted negligent homicide for falling asleep and you may be right. But you can’t seriously believe that someone with a BAC of .02 can be convicted on that alone.


21 posted on 05/18/2009 10:40:48 AM PDT by saleman (!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: saleman

What was it at 7:30 when the crash happened? The article says it was .02 at 9:00. That is an hour and a half after the accident.


25 posted on 05/18/2009 10:48:57 AM PDT by pas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: saleman

3 hours after the fact. Assuming he had a .02 three hours after the event and that he weighs anywhere from 160-180 lbs, that means his BAC at 6 AM was somewhere around .08, but that doesn’t matter, because MA law states that if you’re under 21, .02 is legally drunk.


30 posted on 05/18/2009 11:39:21 AM PDT by OCCASparky (Steely-Eyed Killer of the Deep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: saleman

There is no way he downed 10 beers and blew a .02. 10 beers would be between .13 and .18 depending on his weight.

He either blew 0.2 and the paper screwed up the reporting or he didn’t drink 10 beers.


33 posted on 05/18/2009 12:11:25 PM PDT by MediaMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson