Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

You are better informed than I, I was taking a more ‘literal’ implication as to the ‘Termination’ policy. Somehow, I don’t see that as a ligitimate policy today....


45 posted on 05/18/2009 10:58:54 AM PDT by Hodar (Who needs laws .... when this "feels" so right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: Hodar
No, such a policy would never get past the congressional staff of key politicians from Indian states like Arizona, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Alaska, Minnesota, South Dakota, etc.

And please don't take my posts as criticism of your points. I've worked very closely with the tribes from inside the cognizant federal agencies and have years of experience in dealing with Indian law and tribal issues. It's all very complicated, and very few folks have a detailed understanding of the tribes and the issues and laws that affect them. In short there are now about 562 sovereign tribal governments inside the U.S. today, each with its own leaders, laws, and customs, the federal government is required to interact with them on a government-to-government basis. Needless to say, it gets really tricky.

49 posted on 05/18/2009 11:07:23 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin is a smart missile aimed at the heart of the left!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson