A cop is not a dog. And vice versa. Maybe you are not quite as brilliant as you imagine.
It is not a “dog” in its capacity as a “canine officer”. the reason police dogs were given this distinction is because they serve much in the same way any other “police partner” serves.
the police dog serves alongside his human cop..the canine officer can hold, or grab and hold and “detain” a criminal; they can “attack’ and knock down a criminal, they can “stand in the way of a bullet “ or attack meant for a human officer.
In service, the police dog BECOMES AN EXTENSION OF THE OFFICER....and the officer depends on the canine for intervention, tactical support, combined police work in situations,etc....much like any other “human “ partner.
In legal and in REAL terms, the canine officer IS an officer of the law....not a “dog hanging out with a cop.”
YOU said no crime was committed when you said, “what crime?” in post 13. You have got to be near the top rung of stupid. If you want to argue that the sentence is excessive than fine, that can be legitimate. But to argue that there was no crime when obviously there was simply shows you were dropped on your head too many times as a child.
I've had it with you. Stop taking meth or crack or whatever it is you take moron!