Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: 1rudeboy
One other thing I’m curious about: who controlled Congress when Reagan was in office?

The Reagan administration called for the protective tariffs on Japanese automotive exports. And for a 100% tariff on Brazilian electronics. And for quotas on imported sugar. And for reductions in foreign steel imports. And for duties on imported Japanese motorcycles. And for increased tariffs on Canadian lumber.

But his administration did NOT write NAFTA.

336 posted on 05/11/2009 4:00:23 PM PDT by Mojave (Don't blame me. I voted for McClintock.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 328 | View Replies ]


To: Mojave

That’s correct! NAFTA just appeared from outer space!


338 posted on 05/11/2009 4:01:35 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 336 | View Replies ]

To: Mojave

Ronald Reagan - Statement on the Japan-United States Semiconductor Trade Agreement
March 27, 1987

I am today announcing my intent to raise tariffs on as much as $300 million in Japanese exports to the United States. I am taking these actions in response to Japan’s inability to enforce our September 1986 agreement on semiconductor trade. Regrettably, Japan has not enforced major provisions of the agreement aimed at preventing dumping of semiconductor chips in third country markets and improving U.S. producers’ access to the Japanese market. I am committed to the full enforcement of our trade agreements designed to provide American industry with free and fair trade opportunities.

Under the agreement, which was negotiated to resolve a series of unfair trade practice cases brought by my administration and American industry, the Government of Japan agreed to prevent Japanese semiconductor producers from selling below cost in markets outside Japan and to provide additional access in Japan for foreign producers. Despite monthly consultations with the Japanese since the agreement was signed and repeated assurances that all aspects of the agreement would be fully implemented, the most recent evidence we have demonstrates that dumping has continued. Moreover, American firms’ access to the Japanese market has not improved from last fall’s levels.

The Government of Japan has, in recent days, announced a number of actions aimed at improving their compliance with the agreement. I am encouraged by these steps, and that is why we are not terminating the agreement. When the evidence indicates that third-country dumping has stopped and U.S. firms are enjoying improved access to the Japanese market, I am prepared to lift these sanctions.


350 posted on 05/11/2009 4:20:44 PM PDT by calcowgirl (RECALL Abel Maldonado! - NO on Props 1A 1B 1C 1D 1E 1F)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 336 | View Replies ]

To: Mojave
The Reagan administration called for the protective tariffs on Japanese automotive exports. And for a 100% tariff on Brazilian electronics. And for quotas on imported sugar. And for reductions in foreign steel imports. And for duties on imported Japanese motorcycles. And for increased tariffs on Canadian lumber.

And it was wrong to do so. THAT is the position of a free trade advocate. What Reagan called for was managed trade. Are you comfortable with that statement?

358 posted on 05/11/2009 4:26:01 PM PDT by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the sting of truth is the defense of the indefensible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 336 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson