Fellow Patriots, Just in.... 4/5/09 For Your Widest Possible Distribution!
"The letter below was verified last night when Carl Swensson spoke directly with Cmdr. Walter Fitzpatrick. We now have a green light to spread as far and as fast as we can.
The very special significance of this is in the outcome of the complaint... Only two options: POTUS is removed from office or Cmdr. Walter Fitzpatrick is arrested& no middle ground available.
Since it has been 6 weeks since this was filed and no response was received BHO has effectively acknowledged he is ineligible. With this document in hand anybody in the Country can now file a criminal complaint of Treason and these criminal complaints will and must take priority over civil litigation.
http://www.riseupforamerica.com/
For the first time in our History a sitting POTUS has been officially charged with TREASON
For immediate release... 5/1/09
Everyone seeing this needs to call the Tennessee US Attorneys office and demand ACTION, further, all Circuit court Judges who we serve our indictments to need to be handed a copy of this Criminal Complaint. Our Government is sitting on this. Failure to act means they are complicit.
You wanted a smoking gun? Here it is.
This has been validated as authentic.
NATIONAL GRAND JURY INDICTS OBAMA FOR FRAUD AND TREASON **** OHIO RETURNS INDICTMENT AT 12:30 PM EST 4/25/09 ****
Foreman: Nancy Denutte
Place: Columbus/Blacklick, Ohio
More States are now stepping up to the plate... Keep going folks, we're only going to get better at it!
http://americangrandjury.org/
------ We're all in this together -----
Provided by Robert Hefner
A special thanks to Mark McGrew!!!
Article is on 200+ sites.........including this one:Antonin Scalia Article Page - USATODAY.com
*** IMPORTANT MESSAGE ****
IF ANY OF YOU ARE STILL HAVING TROUBLE FORMING YOUR GRAND JURIES,GET IN TOUCH WITH THOSE ON YOUR LIST AND COMMITT TO BOBS AMERICANGRANDJURY.ORG ASAP. WE ARE RACING AGAINST THE CLOCK
Now we can do it on-line !!!
http://americangrandjury.org/
___Archive of Blog talk Radio program with Mark McGrew--- : http://www.blogtalkradio.com/Sentinel_Radio/2009/04/10/The-Mark-S-McGrew-Show
Dr. Orly Taitz is coming to Atlanta on May 6th. We will be visiting The Capitol and delivering the Georgia Grand Juries Indictments and her Quo Warranto to various State officials. If you'd like to join us on this journey, please contact me at--
prevere@riseupforamerica.com
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/
At approx. 4:15 p.m. March 28th in the city of Stockbridge Ga. the people of Georgia returned an Indictment against Barack Hussein Obama!!!!!!
25 Jurists, duly sworn in, heard tesitmony and in a unanimous vote,
Indicted the usurper.
Georgia Patriots
****Be Proud of yourselves****
You can still contact me and be an Alternate Jurist for our next meeting. Our action will, hopefully get the desired result but will, by no means, end this Georgia Grand Jury. We have more work to do in rooting out the co-conspirators.
God Bless America
Article By Sam Sewell
http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/
Pouring Oil on Troubled Waters
The calming effect of oil was known to the ancient Greeks. In 1762, Benjamin Franklin repeated an experiment first performed by Pliny, which he reported in A Letter from Benjamin Franklin to WilliamBrownrigg, 1773:
I then went to the windward side where they (the waves) began to form; and there the oil, though not more than a teaspoonful, produced an instant calm over a space several yards square which spread amazingly and extended itself gradually till it reached the lee side,making all that quarter of the pond, perhaps half an acre, as smooth as a looking glass.
A strong wind that goes by many names is troubling the waters in America. I dont have enough metaphorical oil to calm the metaphorical troubled waters of all America. However, maybe I have enough oil to calm the trouble stirred up by issues surrounding the Grand Jury effort to indict AKA Obama.
Something as dramatic as citizens themselves deciding to take action by forming Grand Juries to indict a President is certain to stir up emotions on both sides of the issue. My goal in this essay is to replace impulsive emotions with facts and reason.
Let me start with the dangers that emotions can present as a component to solving problems.
Every thought we think changes the activity of specific chemicals in the brain called neuropeptides. What we are thinking about determines what our emotions are.
Interestingly, certain kinds of thinking produce more emotional chemicals than other types of thinking. Analytical, organizational,logistical, and mathematical thinking produces very few emotions. That is why accountants, technical professionals, and mathematicians seem to be so emotionally flat.
Conversely, creative, poetic, descriptive, and interpersonalthinking produces many emotions. People like actors, writers, musicians, and artists frequently have enough emotions for a family of four all by themselves.
Emotions cloud our thinking, cause us to be impulsive, and alienate others. Problem solving is better served by reason than by feelings.
So lets begin with all of those irrational fear mongers who are trying to discourage people from participating in a Grand Jury. From them, we are hearing things like: People cant go around just starting their own pretend Grand Juries. That has got to be against the law. Youll get arrested. You will go to jail for falsifying a court document and impersonating a court official. You have no rightto do such a thing!
Compare such scare tactics aimed at frightening citizens to this clearly stated, rational wording in the Handbook of Texas:
The grand jury's investigation of any matter may be initiated by the court, the district attorney, its own members, or any credible person. The grand jury may summon witnesses by subpoena and examine them under oath. On completion of an investigation the grand jury determines by vote whether or not an indictment should be presented to the court; nine votes are necessary for a decision to indict, and nine members also constitute a quorum.
I have also heard anti-grand Jury people making emotionally driven arguments like: Ordinary people cant just go around making decisions in Grand Juries without being supervised by a lawyer. The whole justice system will fall apart if lawyers arent supervising Grand Juries. Who knows what horrible injustices they will commit without a lawyer to guide them?
In many states governmental lawyers are not only NOT welcome in Grand Jury sessions, they are actually banned by law from any participation in Grand Jury sessions. Take Virginia, for example. The mere presence of a lawyer representing the government will invalidate any decision of a Grand Jury. Without the dramatic rhetoric, see how the State of Virginia explains the Grand Jurys relationship to any such attorneys.
To keep the Grand Jury free from any pressure from the State, Virginia makes it illegal for any attorney representing the State to appear before the Grand Jury, except as a witness.
If, however, members of the Grand Jury have questions about their duties, they may ask the Commonwealth's Attorney for advice.
Except for these two cases, if a Commonwealth's Attorney appears in the Grand Jury Room while the Grand Jury is there, any indictment returned "A True Bill" by the Grand Jury is invalid (no good). Therefore, while a Grand Jury may request the appearance of the Commonwealth's Attorney to testify as a witness or to explain some principle of law about the discharge of their duties, they cannot seek his advice as to whether they should return an indictment as "A True Bill." If a Grand Jury finds that it is in need of advice as to its duties but doesn't know if it can invite the Commonwealth's Attorney into the Grand Jury Room to explain, it should notify the udge that it desires further instructions, and it will receive such instructions in open court.
So, far from citizens not having the authority to form Grand Juries, and far from citizens not being able to function in a grand jury without the advice of an attorney, we discover that the Grand Jury option is designed to be initiated by citizens and to function free from the influence of governmental attorneys.
Although the laws may vary from state to state, Grand Juries are viewed the way United States Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia sees them,
In fact, the whole theory of its function is that it belongs to no branch of the institutional Government, serving as a kind of buffer or referee between the Government and the people."
Also, United States Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia ruled in the case of United States vs. Williams, 504 U.S. 36 at 48 (1992):
Rooted in long centuries of Anglo-American history, Hannah v. Larche, 363 US 420, 490 (1960) with J. Frankfurter concurring in result, the Grand Jury is mentioned in the Bill of Rights, but not in the body of the Constitution. It has not been textually assigned, therefore, to any of the three branches described in the first three Articles. It is a constitutional fixture in its own right.
Clearly stated: The Grand Jury is a separate and equal Constitutional power.
The Grand Jury is not a tool for government to use against its citizens.
So my first teaspoon of rational oil is to still the waters roiled by those who intentionally promulgate unfounded rumors. They are so threatened by the constitutional power of the Grand Jury that they irresponsibly spread their reckless gossip in an attempt to frighten citizens away from exercising their legitimate constitutional rights.
My second teaspoon of rational oil is to be used to still all the angry anti-AKA Obama citizens who use more rhetoric than reason to express themselves.
There are not going to be any lynch parties for politicians. As much as we might mention torches and pitchforks, the only revolution I support and the only revolutions supported by the leadership of the Grand Jury movement is a revolution as defined by the U. S. Constitution. Our forefathers had the wisdom to provide a way for citizens to redress their grievances in a peaceful way.
irresponsible rhetoric that even hints of any action that is not covered by your constitutional rights, please disassociate yourself from the Grand Jury movement. Such attitudes are more of a liability than an asset to the cause.
We welcome and appreciate patriots who are committed to the principles of Constitutional Government.
A little reminder from some old friends of mine:
You say you got a real solution
Well, you know
We'd all love to see the plan
You ask me for a contribution
Well, you know
We're doing what we can
But when you want money
for people with minds that hate
All I can tell is brother you have to wait
Call to Action!
We the people have the power to make REAL change. We are the Fourth Branch of Government equal in power to the other three branches.
The US Constitution Says Judges and Prosecutors Need to BUTT OUT!! of Grand Jury Affairs It's none of their business who we want to indict.
Carl now looking for more former Military Officers to come forward and file the same complaint along with Citizens following suit...
Game plan is still the same, Top Down and Bottom up approach. State AGs and State US Attorneys form the top and local Judges and Sheriffs from the bottom.
This is really it, end game is upon us&"
If you have difficulty contacting Carl Swensson, please let me know and I'll hook you up directly.
William G. Steiner, BS, M.Ed (PA Dept of Correctional Education, Retired)
Email: n3auj@zoominternet.net
P.S. Dr. Orly Taitz is coming to Atlanta on May 6th. We will be visiting The Capitol and delivering the Georgia Grand Juries Indictments and her Quo Warranto to various State officials. If you'd like to join us on this journey, please contact me (Carl Swensson) at--
prevere@riseupforamerica.com "
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/
--
Will there be cheese served at the trial?
I like cheese.
If only this were true. :-\
This is series!
Thanks, Leo. Look at the ridiculous movement you inspired. Armed with misinformation, these people have become dangerous!
It will be interesting to see the reaction (if any) of the US Naval Academy to CDR Fitzpatrick’s use of USNA letterhead for his “indictment”.
Sure they will. So...what's stopping you?
I like cheese.
GREAT POST.
THANKS.
Rambling nonsense.
Ol’ Fitz uses the phrase “foreign born domestic enemy”. He obviously is unfamiliar with those words. A foreign born person cannot possibly be a domestic enemy.
Everything you write is true, but I’m not wearing any pants.
Aww, your just teason me.
Sure. BTW, April 1 has come and gone.
Interesting. Verrrrrrrrrrrrrrry interesting.
Now checkout the investigation regarding former Senator John Edwards. I can see this same similar situation eventually getting around to Barack Obama.
§ 7A‑66. Removal of district attorneys.
The following are grounds for suspension of a district attorney or for his removal from office:
(1) Mental or physical incapacity interfering with the performance of his duties which is, or is likely to become, permanent;
(2) Willful misconduct in office;
(3) Willful and persistent failure to perform his duties;
(4) Habitual intemperance;
(5) Conviction of a crime involving moral turpitude;
(6) Conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice which brings the office into disrepute; or
(7) Knowingly authorizing or permitting an assistant district attorney to commit any act constituting grounds for removal, as defined in subdivisions (1) through (6) hereof.
A proceeding to suspend or remove a district attorney is commenced by filing with the clerk of superior court of the county where the district attorney resides a sworn affidavit charging the district attorney with one or more grounds for removal. The clerk shall immediately bring the matter to the attention of the senior regular resident superior court judge for the district or set of districts as defined in G.S. 7A‑41.1(a) in which the county is located who shall within 30 days either review and act on the charges or refer them for review and action within 30 days to another superior court judge residing in or regularly holding the courts of that district or set of districts.
If the superior court judge upon review finds that the charges if true constitute grounds for suspension, and finds probable cause for believing that the charges are true, he may enter an order suspending the district attorney from performing the duties of his office until a final determination of the charges on the merits.
During the suspension the salary of the district attorney continues. If the superior court judge finds that the charges if true do not constitute grounds for suspension or finds that no probable cause exists for believing that the charges are true, he shall dismiss the proceeding. etcetera
http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/enactedlegislation/statutes/html/bysection/chapter_7a/gs_7a-66.html