Posted on 05/01/2009 6:03:45 PM PDT by Chet 99
That’s why you shoot them instead of hiding on your roof.
That probably doesn’t jive with your disposition though.
A friend had a neighbor with two dogs that would threaten him every time he walked outside. Shotgun made the neighbor ask some questions. The answer was that it was to shoot some dogs. Fence went up fast.
The decision of not carrying a gun under these circumstances will bite them in the ass.
Its better to shoot the dog BEFORE it kills a little kid.
The neck tattoo is a classy touch that says, "I am someone's property"
Looks like a decent working-class neighborhood except for the rundown house with the pit bulls.
They should call trooper Wooton of Waterville, Vermont. He handles things like this:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2241834/posts
Barring that, I’d say just kill them one way or the other. It’s an old and simple (but proven) solution that can be applied to a multitude of problems that arise in our modern and increasingly complex world.
When I lived in Ohio, I had a neighbor who kept several large dogs in a pen. One time one of them got loose and chased me. The stupid cur tried to crawl under the fence around my house and got stuck under the fence.
The damn dog was whining like crazy, and the neighbor wasn’t home. I called the Dog warden in my county to come take care of the problem, He wasn’t home, so I called the Sheriff, and he shot the stupid thing. After the fact, the deputy told me that he wouldn’t have given a rats’ petoot if I shot the sonofabitch myself.
It’s a gun-shoot-dog world.
It’s like crack huh Chet99, you just can’t stop.
After my beagle was killed by a Pit it’s been shoot on site.
The situation in Sanford, FL has the potential to yield beaucoup future pit bull posts from Chet99...Sanford is his seventh heaven!
nice Skeeter,
what is that? I think Taurus has a titanium model, .38 gauge, 5 shot.
I detest government regulation. Dangerous animals however, do require control... No matter the number of horrible incidents - owners of dangerous animals seem to be frequently disengaged from the truth ... well, “he wouldn’t bite anyone...” so the sad story goes for the 100 pound muscular ‘road side bomb on leash’ goes...
I propose - ‘Don’t discriminate’. If a state or community can legislate huge insurance coverages / fees, caging requirements, etc. or even outright forbid ownership for lions, tigers, and other large normally WILD CATS... (that can easily KILL PEOPLE) — then the same type of license fees can be proscribed by law for certain breeds of (what often prove to be by actual police records) just dogs - BIG MUSCULAR DOGS - with the biting power of a mechanized vise.
I love dogs, cats, and most other animals (no I am not a member of PETA and don’t identify with their cause)... I do frequently rescue lost and or abused domestic animals and appreciate the variations in their behavior... BUT THERE IS A LIMIT...
High license fees and strict caging requirements will weed out the casual owner who does not see the sense in fully controlling their ‘pet’
And I am talking THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS to own lions, tigers, pits, and other vicious dog breeds....
And - if you hate me for my opinion — then too bad...
The answer to that type of headache is a lead aspirin.
I sure hope they don’t get into a saucer of antifreeze. Two oz. of that stuff and they will be goners. My friend was working on his car and drained the radiator into a pan, the neighbor’s German Shepard was sipping the stuff, he ran the dog off and he fell dead before he reached home.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.