Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ResponseAbility

Hardly, you are the one lashing out with emotion. I base my reasoning on biblical principles and that we are to be responsible for our actions and decisions. You are trying to change the issue to other things (abortion, etc) because you’re losing the issue we’re discussing.

The guy could have gotten rid of his pet any number of lawful ways, and he chose instead to abandon and dump the animal. Where he lives (and where most people live) that’s either an ordinance violation or a misdemeanor. Nobody forced him to BUY the pet in the first place, but he did, and he has to be responsible for its welfare because it is a domesticated animal. If he no longer wants to be responsible for it, he needs to either turn it into a shelter, sell it to people who will be responsible for it, any number of things that he could have done that are lawful, responsible ways to do so.

Your attempt to bring up other issues unrelated to this is a deflectionary tactic and I see right through it. If you are so concerned as you say you are about the other issues why then are you wasting your time arguing with me about this? You must be bored.

Bottom line, is that we have animal cruelty laws, we have animal welfare laws, and it not out of line for the state to expect people who buy a domesticated pet animal to follow through and take care of it, or if they don’t want it anymore, to do so in ways that are not cruel or simply abandoning it altogether. There are laws that say you can’t just abandon your animals. Most communities have them in some form.

And how we treat our animals is a measure of how we treat people. I wouldn’t hold a person in high regard if he beat his dog all the time. Or the dog was always sick and looking not cared for.


74 posted on 04/30/2009 2:58:01 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: Secret Agent Man

No, I am not the one using emotion based arguments, you are. Where in the Bible does it say the government must punish people for not treating an animal as it says?

The laws interfering with human rights over animal rights are wrong and should be abandoned. It is also wrong to cause animals to needlessly suffer...just keep the government out of it.


83 posted on 04/30/2009 8:47:39 PM PDT by ResponseAbility (Government tends to never fix the problems it creates in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson