Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Sarah Jessica)Parker,(Matthew) Broderick expecting twins by surrogate
boston.com ^ | 4/29/09 | AP

Posted on 04/29/2009 2:34:01 PM PDT by GQuagmire

LOS ANGELES—Sarah Jessica Parker and Matthew Broderick will be taking on new roles: parents of twin girls. The "Sex and the City" star and her actor-husband are expecting twins through a surrogate pregnancy, representatives for the couple said Tuesday.

(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Miscellaneous; Music/Entertainment
KEYWORDS: hollyweirdshill; paidpublicist; snore; stupidpeople; surrogates
File in the FWIW dept.
1 posted on 04/29/2009 2:34:01 PM PDT by GQuagmire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GQuagmire

strange children.....


2 posted on 04/29/2009 2:34:46 PM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GQuagmire

I understand they are registered at Tractor Supply.....


3 posted on 04/29/2009 2:35:15 PM PDT by TexasNative2000 ("What's in YOUR wallet? MY MONEY!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GQuagmire

Why do these people reproduce?


4 posted on 04/29/2009 2:37:12 PM PDT by Lockbar (March toward the sound of the guns.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lockbar

s j parker can probably bring twins to term in her huge head.


5 posted on 04/29/2009 2:46:10 PM PDT by Vaquero ("an armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GQuagmire

6 posted on 04/29/2009 2:47:50 PM PDT by Lizavetta (Politicians: When they're not lying, they're stealing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GQuagmire

What, does it mean that Matthew bonked the surrogate for a payment or was it a threesome?


7 posted on 04/29/2009 2:49:45 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasNative2000

You mean because she looks like a horse?


8 posted on 04/29/2009 2:58:05 PM PDT by FrdmLvr (What fresh hell is this?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GQuagmire

Why do so few celebrities have children ‘normally’? They either buy them or pay others to have them for them. Is it vanity? Is it sham marriages between gay people who won’t breed naturally?
Even Angelina Jolie is getting pregnant repeatedly by in-vitro. Is Brad a dud? Eventually there will be no natural conceptions or births by the actual mother in Hollywood at all. W E I R D.
And I agree that Jessica Parker is one homely woman. Not her fault, but OY!


9 posted on 04/29/2009 3:07:00 PM PDT by ClearBlueSky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lockbar
"Why do these people reproduce?"

Because the can pay someone to do it for them.

10 posted on 04/29/2009 3:11:28 PM PDT by LiberConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LiberConservative

Outsourcing,,that’s it.


11 posted on 04/29/2009 3:13:22 PM PDT by cajungirl (no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: GQuagmire

WHO FRIKKIN CARES???
WHY IS THIS NEWS???
CELEBUTARDS REPRODUCING IS NOT SOMETHING TO BE CELEBRATED.
JUST MAKES MORE CELEBUTARDS.
OK I’m better now.


12 posted on 04/29/2009 3:37:11 PM PDT by Texas resident (Older but smarter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!
There are rumours that Broderick wouldn't find that appealing.
13 posted on 04/29/2009 3:45:37 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ClearBlueSky

“Even Angelina Jolie is getting pregnant repeatedly by in-vitro.”

I haven’t ever read that. Where did you get that info, just out of curiousity?


14 posted on 04/29/2009 3:46:57 PM PDT by tuffydoodle (Shut up voices, or I'll poke you with a Q-Tip again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: GQuagmire
Broderick lackluster in unfocused British comedy - Reuters - ‎Apr 27, 2009‎
15 posted on 04/29/2009 3:50:16 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearBlueSky

In SJP’s case, I wonder if it has to do with her smoking. Maybe she decided that a pregnancy at her age is risky enough, add smoking into it and that baby is NOT in a healthy environment. They’re a pretty private couple, by celebutard standards, so I doubt we’ll ever know.


16 posted on 04/29/2009 5:08:54 PM PDT by grellis (I am Jill's overwhelming sense of disgust.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson