Posted on 04/25/2009 3:40:11 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer
April 25, 2009 (Computerworld) Microsoft Corp. will unveil an add-on to Windows 7 that lets users run applications designed for Windows XP in a virtual machine, the company confirmed Friday -- the first time Microsoft has relied on virtualization to provide backward compatibility.
(Excerpt) Read more at computerworld.com ...
So to fix this problem, here comes Windows 7. Apparently Microsoft thinks this will be the best for both the customer and Microsoft. Microsoft will get the money from the upgrade, and the customers will have a pre-installed downgrade back to what they already had.
Microsoft is doing everything they can to make XP run slow and make “7” look as good as possible.
Windows 98 was released in 1998. Windows XP in 2001. Windows Vista in 2007. Hardly the business model you describe.
You need to include M$ Office in your timeline along with W98SE, ME, & W2k.
Yawn.
So much FUD in one little comment it’s unbelievable. Repeat after me “I am a luddite”. Thanks.
Oh yes,
Classic Mode, running in emulation under Mac System 10
Motorola x68 code running under emulation on PPC
and yes, Windows on any Mac
Apple got this one down a long time ago.
Ctrl-Alt-Del
Here is the real history.
Connectix creates Virtual PC for Mac
Connectix is Purchased by MS and released as freeware to anyone who wants it on their Windows PC
Apple decides to build their own Virtual Machine to allow OS9 to operate on OSX
Windows 7 provides complete integration between Virtual XP and Windows 7.
So yeah ol’ Apple sure was a real trailblazer there.lol.
Yes,
Silicon is Silicon
Bits and Logic are universal
It seems odd that Microsoft would trumpet a technology
that has already been implemented in a rigorous fashion
on entirely different OS’ And declare it a gamechanger instead of the clear admission of a profoundly flawed OS launch
Fast forward to today with MS. One of the biggest problems with Windows is all the code that supports all the old APIs back to Windows 95. This mess of code is unwieldy and largely insecure. I've suggested for quite a while that one of the best things MS could do is dump most of all of the legacy junk in favor of a new, clean API and support older applications via a compatibility layer, just like Apple did. Maybe they are finally getting around to this realization.
Last I looked MS didn’t write this article and if you would remove your head from your nether regions you would realize their implementation of it is novel, and this takes another weapon from the FUDpacker crowd, they cried about compatibility and losing legacy software and they also cried about Windows bloat and system gremlins well this helps to change that. Now your reaction is just what I expect from a liberal. Nothing is ever good enough, a company shouldn’t be proud of it’s offerings and they should sit their and give away their business to please the crybabies and freebie seekers. Jumping in on an OS topic makes you realize just how close some freepers are to being actual liberals.
The article is a repackaging of a Microsoft Press Release
I still miss DOS and Basic.
they cried about compatibility and losing legacy software and they also cried about Windows bloat and system gremlins well this helps to change that.
Yup. No two ways about it; if you solve the "legacy" issue with virtualization, you can go to a clean slate and do things right in your new OS. You can even go to Unix and thereby make yourself as hard a target for hackers as Linux and OS X have shown themselves to be. That would put the "security by obscurity" theory of Linux/OS X to the ultimate test.Trouble is that if you do that you place yourself on a level playing field with Linux and OS X, two other Unix-based or (in the case of OS X, actual UnixTM) operating systems which can also virtualize Windows XP. You do that, and you then have to explain why Windows 7 is enough better than Linux to be worth its price - and make the case that Windows 7 is either better than (good luck with that), or comparable to and cheaper than, OS X.
If you are Microsoft you can probably sell Windows 7, with Win XP included, cheaper than Apple gets for OS X licenses, considering that Apple offers OS X licenses only for use on Apple-built computers.
I wonder if it will allow me to import my sofware and other settings directly into the Windows7 virtual XP mode?
“Microsoft is doing everything they can to make XP run slow and make 7 look as good as possible.”
I’ve been using 7 since the 7057 beta and it’s miles ahead of both Vista and XP. I just hope the final product remains as impressive.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.