you haven’t presented anything showing an error on my part. You’ve presented great arguments against YOUR version of what I said, but YOUR version is not what I said.
172 posted on 04/27/2009 9:12:29 AM PDT by razorboy
You said "Do you understand whats under the covers of the NT Kernel is antique DOS code? The only bubble bursting is the one of people that think NT was completely new from the ground up. MS advertised it that way, but they lied like rugs, and everything thats been added to the NT kernel is just adding more stuff to that original DOS and VMS core.
References please.
173 posted on 04/27/2009 9:25:20 AM PDT by Hodar
(Who needs laws .... when this "feels" so right?)