But that’s not what you said I said. Here’s what you said I said: This person insists, that because he can still run DOS commands, this is proof that Windows is just a DOS based application, sitting on top of DOS.
And your quote just proved that’s a lie.
As for what’s best to do, you and Devnet have done nothing but browbeat attempt to humiliate and insult me.
I made no misstatement, and understanding that there’s still DOS logic and code in the gut of Windows won’t impede anyone learning how to use it. In fact it will help, very often when you run into something in Windows that just seems too stupid to be true remembering that it’s been built on top of a 30 year old single user single threaded no communication with other computers OS helps a person understand why the hell they did that.
And I’ve been in the industry for 15 years, mostly working the Windows world. So you can stop waving your “quals” around I don’t care, and stop making assumptions to compound your lies.
Can you provide ONE source? I’ve given 3 sources showing your error, from microsoft, from developer sites and from an archive site on ‘ancient OS’s’.
Can you provide one site that states what you are asserting? If you like, I can list many, many sites on programming, the NT kernal, as well as college courses dealing with multi-thread computing.
Google is your friend. Just show one reputable web-site that states that Windows is still built on top of DOS, or uses DOS, or is built from a DOS kernal.
Good luck.