Your posts are a mixture of bald assertion, projection, attributing motives to people then passing judgment on those (strawmen), appealing to authority, all layered in with condescension, sarcasm and various tricks to derail/change the topic. Maybe in your perception that passes for a solid science understanding.
What you are doing is apologetics for evolutionsm.
Which part is which? I have told you time and time again what a scientific theory is -- you just put your fingers in your ears. I have been crystal clear on the science behind my contentions. Your little tantrum here doesn't change a thing. I know of what I speak -- you do not.
What you are doing is apologetics for evolutionsm.
How can anyone do apologetics for science? That is like saying I am doing apologetics for electricity or chemistry. Science provides the foundation for the very computer you are using to post the messages you are using to undermine it.
It is scientific principles and techniques that provide these facilities to you.
The irony is palpable.
And please not there is no sarcasm -- this is a simple question of people who have knowledge and those who do not.
Let me ask you -- what is your opinion of 2VL vs 3VL? Are gravitons measurable? Do quanta violate time paradigms?
I am sure you can address these simple questions with the same background you use to address other technical questions.
My statements have millions of scientists and billions of data points backing them up. I can describe them and the science behind them.
"I know you are but what am" I may amuse your other friends, but us grown ups just smirk.