[Boxen]

No, I said most of the time the articles you post do not rely on creation-ID journal-style publications. Again, as an example, any article by Brian Thomas M.S.*, who usually cites an article from a more scientific publication (For example, Nature) and reinterprets the article without providing original evidence or research. Even then, I read the underlying citation. If I don't have time to read it, I usually don't post.

[GodGunsGuts]

That’s very thorough of you. For my part, I post Creation/ID papers and articles from a variety of sites on a regular basis. I post from these sites because they have shown me time and again that they are worthy of my trust. And speaking of Brian Thomas, he has an M.S. in Biotechnology, and taught science at the college level for a number of years. I have yet to run into a single Evo who can point to where he mischaracterized the claims of Evo scientsts. Where the Evos disagree with him (and every creation scientist for that matter) is when he reinterprets the data to show why creation/ID is the better inference.