Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Susan Boyle: the Newest Voice of "Generation Jones"
BlogCritics Magazine ^ | April 21, 2009 | Alie James

Posted on 04/21/2009 11:34:49 AM PDT by Linda is Watching

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

1 posted on 04/21/2009 11:34:49 AM PDT by Linda is Watching
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Linda is Watching
I like her, but I fear I could OD quite quickly if this keeps up.
2 posted on 04/21/2009 11:40:14 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("Only after disaster can we be resurrected." -- Tyler Durden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Linda is Watching
I just checked, and it appears that Susan Boyle was born in 1961. That makes her a Baby Boomer. The commonly accepted years for the Baby Boom are 1946-64.

Of course I find this whole "generation" thing terribly overrated, and "generations" seem to be getting shorter all the time.

3 posted on 04/21/2009 11:48:31 AM PDT by Charles Henrickson (b. 1953)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Linda is Watching

I am in awe of Susan’s voice, but what’s this about Generation Jones? Apparently I didn’t get the email. According to Wikipedia (gag) now that I’ve at last found my generation group (not that I’ve ever used the supposed ever so popular ‘70s term “jonesing”) I’m lumped together with Hussein.... sigh, can’t seem to catch a break.


4 posted on 04/21/2009 11:49:27 AM PDT by bgill (The evidence simply does not support the official position of the Obama administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Linda is Watching
I cry each time I watch Susan Boyle singing

You probably cry when Barry Hussein reads his teleprompter, too.

I've had enough of Susan Boyle for a dozen lifetimes. She was okay... not amazing. And the entire BGT clip was totally scripted (it's a carbon copy of the ending of the first Babe film).

5 posted on 04/21/2009 11:59:31 AM PDT by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Linda is Watching

Boomers are those who were influenced by the extremely optimistic years from the turning point of WW2 until the first cracks in the dam at the outset of the 1960s. Xers are those influenced by the more pessimistic vibe from 1960 until Reagan stepped up to the plate. Influence determines generational characteristics. There is no Generation Jones, the real issue is the Boomer definition is too expansive and the Xer one is not expansive enough.


6 posted on 04/21/2009 12:01:07 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bgill
...but what’s this about Generation Jones? Apparently I didn’t get the email. According to Wikipedia (gag) now that I’ve at last found my generation group (not that I’ve ever used the supposed ever so popular ‘70s term “jonesing”) I’m lumped together with Hussein.... sigh, can’t seem to catch a break.

I have officially designated those born between 1956 and 1963, Generation Murgatroyd.

Why? Because those are the years in which most of my friends were born and one of my friends is fond of saying, "Heavens to Murgatroyd!" A phrase popularized by the cartoon character, Snagglepuss. By the way, Snagglepuss was created in 1959, in the midst of Generation Murgatroyd.

7 posted on 04/21/2009 12:12:57 PM PDT by Ghengis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Charles Henrickson

Really, who made up this Generation Jones, sh**?


8 posted on 04/21/2009 12:35:54 PM PDT by Clock King
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ghengis
Since we are just making up new generations, I belong to Generation Kick Ass. To be in Generation Kick Ass you have to be born between 12:01am on November 5th to 11:59pm on November 5th.
9 posted on 04/21/2009 12:43:42 PM PDT by A Texan (Oderint dum metuant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ghengis

“I have officially designated those born between 1956 and 1963, Generation Murgatroyd.”

Ooooh! Can I be in your generation? PLEEEAAAASE?

Exit stage left...


10 posted on 04/21/2009 12:48:11 PM PDT by mrs. a (It's a short life but a merry one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard

“She was okay... not amazing.”

Scripted or not, she is AMAZING.

Anyone that can sing like that deserves the appellation of amazing.

I’d listen to her all day long, she’s far better than most of the “artists” available in any music genre at the moment.

And yes the word “artists” drips with sarcasm.


11 posted on 04/21/2009 12:58:18 PM PDT by swmobuffalo ("We didn't seek the approval of Code Pink and MoveOn.org before deciding what to do")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ghengis
By the way, Snagglepuss was created in 1959, in the midst of Generation Murgatroyd.

That post was creative...fuuuunny EEEven.

12 posted on 04/21/2009 1:05:00 PM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: swmobuffalo

I thought she was okay. Not spectacular, not amazing, not the “voice of a thousand angels”, or anything else. I don’t get the weeping. She was just okay.

Different strokes, I guess.


13 posted on 04/21/2009 1:09:29 PM PDT by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Charles Henrickson

Nice article, Alie James. I was drawn to it because you wrote about Generation Jones, but once I read it, I went to your blog and enjoyed also the other things you write about.

As far as Boyle’s generational identity, Alie James is correct...born in ‘61, Boyle is part of Generation Jones—born 1954-1965, between the Boomers and Generation X. Google Generation Jones, and you’ll see it’s gotten a ton of media attention, and many top commentators from many top publications and networks (Washington Post, Time magazine, NBC, Newsweek, ABC, FNC, etc.) now specifically use this term.

It is important to distinguish between the post-WWII demographic boom in births vs. the cultural generations born during that era. Generations are a function of the common formative experiences of its members, not the fertility rates of its parents. Many experts now believe it breaks down this way:

DEMOGRAPHIC boom in babies: 1946-1964
Baby Boom GENERATION: 1942-1953
Generation Jones: 1954-1965
Generation X: 1966-1978


14 posted on 04/21/2009 1:43:23 PM PDT by politico 2006
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GOP_1900AD

The data I’ve seen makes a convincing case that there is definitely a distinct generation between the Boomers and GenXers. The fact that Generation Jones has become so accepted nationally so quickly speaks to the existence of this “lost” generation.

Here’s a 5 minute video with over 20 top political figures discussing the existence and importance of GenJones: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Ta_Du5K0jk


15 posted on 04/21/2009 1:58:48 PM PDT by politico 2006
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: politico 2006

Accepted nationally? Go poll ten random people on the street. You’ll be lucky two of them have ever even heard of it.


16 posted on 04/21/2009 2:27:31 PM PDT by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: politico 2006; Ghengis

I can see why some academics (and marketeers) endeavor to define this cohort, but why have the dimwitted label “Generation Jones”?

Since I am also a member of this club, I vote we choose “Generation Murgatroyd” instead. This has the added value of self-identifying members (who else would know how to use ‘Murgatroyd’ in a sentence). All we need is a shorthand catchphrase, a nickname even.

And Obama can’t be a member since Snagglepuss didn’t gain much of a following outside the US.


17 posted on 04/21/2009 2:32:01 PM PDT by fnord (There's a reason we don't often hear about a Michelob deal gone bad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard

I’ve been following the emergence of this Generation Jones phenomenom pretty carefully, and there is no doubt it has become quite well known and accepted in a relatively short time. I did a book search about this a few weeks ago and found that four of the last five books published about generations in the U.S. all included a separate chapter for Generation Jones and treated GenJones as a full bona fide generation between Boom & X. The academic literature regularly includes GenJones now in sociological discussions of U.S. generations. Take a look at this page, I found this to be a pretty good overview about some of the mainstream media attention GenJones is getting. I think after looking at this you’d have to admit (if you are willing to be objective) that GenJones is getting major media play:
http://generationjones.com/2009latest.html


18 posted on 04/21/2009 3:03:49 PM PDT by politico 2006
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: fnord

It’s interesting to me that you don’t like the GenJones label. A bunch of friends and I had a long talk about that exact topic recently at a dinner party, and the overwhelming conclusion was that almost everyone there who voiced an opinion liked this name for our generation. When you look at the names other generations have gotten stuck with, I’m feeling grateful that we got GenJones. I think this article by the guy who coined the term makes a good case for this generational name:
http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/news/20090127/column27_st.art.htm


19 posted on 04/21/2009 3:15:07 PM PDT by politico 2006
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: fnord
Since I am also a member of this club, I vote we choose “Generation Murgatroyd” instead.

Tom Tomorrow is a flaming lib cartoonist, but he nailed this topic years ago

My Generation

(can't get the hotlink to work, get the dreaded red 'X', but it's worth a ready).

20 posted on 04/21/2009 3:15:15 PM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson