how does a filthy queer get to be a judge anyway???
Posted on 04/20/2009 4:14:16 PM PDT by JoeProBono
Miss California is not backing down from the answer regarding gay marriage she gave on Sunday night's Miss USA telecast. Carrie Prejean told FOXNews.com that she had "no regrets" and was happy with the answer she gave when a Miss USA judge, the gossip blogger Perez Hilton, asked about her stance on same-sex marriage. "I think that I believe that a marriage should be between a man and a woman," she said on the live broadcast. "No offense to anybody out there, but that's how I was raised."
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
She’s gorgeous. If I lived in CA, I’d give her a call ;)
Hopefully she will be more famous BECAUSE of this controversy
She seems so nice :D
WHO one? (see what I mean?)
Well, she certainly lost the votes of the gay judges. Just why do they have gay and female judges for a beauty contest anyway?
Hey, 52% of our voters agreed with her. She represented California well.
Forgot to add - in a beauty pageant.
I just wish she hadn’t said, “No offense to anybody out there.”
Do gays ever apologize to heterosexuals for favoring gay marriage?
As far as I’m concerned you if you believe that marriage should be only between one man and one woman you have nothing to apologize for.
Good for her!
This type of setup and unethical baiting has been a major tactic used by the immoral left for decades. They put the conservative in a situation where depending upon the answer to the fixed question, the conservative will either submit to the immoral view or the conservative target will stand for truth and have their career destroyed while undergoing decades of mockery and ridicule.
This is how the left has destroyed morality, faith and our constitutional law.
The left has no shame, they have no tolerance for other opinions, especially opinions that disagree with modern, aggressive immorality, while disagreeing with four centuries of American law and culture.
how does a filthy queer get to be a judge anyway???
Threats of law suits and protests. That’s a start.
’ “It’s ugly,” said Scott Ihrig, a gay man, who attended the pageant with his partner. “I think it’s ridiculous that she got first runner-up. That is not the value of 95 percent of the people in this audience. Look around this audience and tell me how many gay men there are.” ‘
Man, you can’t make this stuff up. Note to Mr. Ihrig: the audience isn’t voting. BTW, That is not the value of 95 percent of the American public.
Why is a gay male a jduge in a female beauty contest? That would be like Janet Reno judging beefcake.
She is not guilty of anything, at anytime, or anywhere in the world, period!
i guess my question is, why was he even considered as a judge in the first place??? no laws broken for not asking a filthy queer to judge women...
Best-looking flag? I think not. Never mind it’s not simple enough.
As for Texas - you’re talking in absolutes. What about percentages?
I will give you “the people” of CA have spoken well on the big referenda. Too bad they also put in judges who scrap them.
And you know, I had no idea who this guy was when he showed up as a judge on TRUMP’S show (Celebrity) Apprentice the other week. Suddenly he’s everywhere.
To add balance. Including, keeping their tongues and eyes in check.
I disagree.
I will give you “the people” of CA have spoken well on the big referenda. Too bad they also put in judges who scrap them.
You can say the same thing for the entire country. Looked at Congress, the Senate and the White House lately?
Well said!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.