Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Time For Mankiw To Resign
Global Economic Analysis ^ | 04/19/09

Posted on 04/20/2009 8:52:51 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

Time For Mankiw To Resign

On Saturday I checked my watch to verify the date. A quick check showed it was April 18. Just to be sure I asked my wife Joanne and she assured me it was the 18th. Likewise my computer said it was the 18th.

For a brief moment, I thought we had flashed back in time and it was April 1.

April Fool's day was the only rational explanation I could come up with for a column in the New York Times by Gregory Mankiw, professor of economics at Harvard.

(Excerpt) Read more at globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: insanity; mankiw; mish; shedlock
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: Lonesome in Massachussets
Unfortunately, in the field of economics, there are far more of them favoring inflation tool than those against it. The likes of Mankiw is not the exception but a norm. Politicians take it one step further, though.
21 posted on 04/20/2009 10:57:08 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (from "Irrational Exuberance" to "Mark to Zero": from '96 to '09)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Up until this article Mankiw always seem sane and somewhat moderate. On his blog he is now making the perfectly true, though trivial, point that negative real interest rates achieved through inflation would be preferable to deficit spending by the administration.

He’s presenting what I think is a false dichotomy: Stimulus or Inflation. Of course with the Obama stimulus we’ve have the worst of both worlds. He seems to saying that using inflation to prod the private sector to spend and invest makes more sense than having the Democrats blow it all on special interests. Maybe just. But he seems to discount the fact that free markets, nor even the Federal Reserve can maintain negative interest indefinitely (or we’d all be getting paid to borrow money). Eventually, and in my opinion sooner rather than later, real interest rates rise faster, a lot faster, than inflation.

http://gregmankiw.blogspot.com/


22 posted on 04/20/2009 11:10:45 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (The age of 0bama: the transient ischemic delusions of adequacy decade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
Those holding U.S. paper currency are doing us a favor.

I rather think not! The drug kingpins have billions in hard cash and that is what is funding the ongoing shooting war in Mexico. Some favor!

I was under the impression that the "new design" for our currency was to thwart the state sponsored counterfeiting going on in North Korea and Iran. Those two countries were conducting "economic warfare" on the US economy by pumping out billions of dollars in "almost perfect" counterfeit one hundred dollar bills of the "old design". They were causing inflation in the US while generating their own "foreign exchange". The intent to issue new currency does nothing to stop them if we do not pull the old bills from circulation.

Regards,
GtG

PS Swamp the Treasury? Horse feathers, they can print up a couple trillion on demand from the Obamanation, or so we're told.

23 posted on 04/20/2009 11:20:42 AM PDT by Gandalf_The_Gray (I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
I think his latent leaning is now manifesting itself in a rather unfortunate manner, when the economy is backed into a corner, and we ran out of easy option, facing bitter medicine.

He is sort of panicking, in short. I think there are many other economists panicking, too. It shows. This looming catastrophe could irreparably damage their credibility.

24 posted on 04/20/2009 11:33:48 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (from "Irrational Exuberance" to "Mark to Zero": from '96 to '09)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
Google "counterfeit superbills" to find more regarding the overseas counterfeiting. Treasury doesn't like to talk about it so you have to dig around to find any information.

Regards,
GtG

25 posted on 04/20/2009 11:55:35 AM PDT by Gandalf_The_Gray (I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Gandalf_The_Gray

I agree, people counterfeiting our currency do not do us a favor. However, when someone stores or hoards genuine U.S. currency they are doing us a favor by making an interest free (or as Mankiw would say, negative interest rate) loan.

People do this because they see the greenback as a stable reservoir of wealth, with excellent liquidity.

If we haven’t got the self discipline to validate those assumptions, shame on us.


26 posted on 04/20/2009 11:56:38 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (The age of 0bama: the transient ischemic delusions of adequacy decade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Visit his website. I rather like him.

Lots of economist warned of the current debacle. Policy makers kicked the can down the road hoping the dam would burst after their term was over, to mix metaphors.


27 posted on 04/20/2009 11:59:05 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (The age of 0bama: the transient ischemic delusions of adequacy decade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
I don't know what they said among themselves at faculty lounges, but when they spoke at public forum, they usually went along with Wall St. lines. Even when they criticized it, they made sure they hedge it correctly. Because frontal challenge can get himself buried. I have been an outsider on this issue for close to 13 years. Even though I am not an economist, I tried to look for economists or other experts who can spell out the magnitude of crisis which would be forthcoming. Except the case of Stiglitz, most were rather meek. Many were busy towing the consensus. Even Stiglitz and Schiller were not forceful enough.

It is apparent that they stayed away fearing that any serious challenge would set back the expansion of global economy and free trade. The typical argument has been that we have some problems, it could go bad, however, it will turn out alright in the end.

28 posted on 04/20/2009 12:22:12 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (from "Irrational Exuberance" to "Mark to Zero": from '96 to '09)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

I’m not an economist, but I knew that America couldn’t live on Asian credit forever. I was hoping for a soft landing for the economy. The longer you try to postpone the inevitable, generally, the worse the consequences.

Obama seems to introducing the worst possible witch’s brew of fiscal, monetary and environmental policy all at once, essentially a perfect storm (to mix another metaphor). If we get out of his adminstration without a severe depression, it will be a miracle. And he seems to be completely clueless.

If we’re lucky, we’ll recover in a generation or two (I’ll be dead by then anyway.) If not we’ll do like the Soviet Union and spiral down for seventy years. The Russians are still at least a generation way from getting over the hang over from the Soviet economic miracle.


29 posted on 04/20/2009 12:34:27 PM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (The age of 0bama: the transient ischemic delusions of adequacy decade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
Obama is a blank sheet on which people can draw anything they want. However, he cannot deliver any. His government is filled with so-called whiz kids who are banking on financial version of Hail-Mary pass to score an upset touchdown at the buzzer, or liberal hacks who want to clear up the backlog of age-old liberal agendas. Useless bunch of people he assembled.

Yes, nobody is more qualified to turn a disaster into a catastrophe than a Harvard madman(remember Unabomber?)

30 posted on 04/20/2009 12:47:14 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (from "Irrational Exuberance" to "Mark to Zero": from '96 to '09)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Bill Buckly was right
31 posted on 05/16/2009 3:57:00 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (AGWT is very robust with respect to data. All observations confirm it at the 100% confidence level.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson