[KJC1]

Thats what the dog knows as a natural reaction.

That is entirely incorrect. You should revisit that point. Pits are not by nature human-aggressive.

I won't try to convince you that you are wrong; you seem to have your mind made up since you accuse pit owners of being delusional like liberals. You just don't realize that you are doing the exact thing you accuse others of, reacting based on sensational stories and emotion even though you clearly (based on your quote I posted) really do not know of what you speak.

[goat granny]

If you think Pits are not human aggressive, what species keep having to go the hospital or morgue due to the breeds mauling? I also have a bridge in Brooklyn I have title to and will sell it to you cheap...all you have to do is make a toll bridge out of it and you could be rich.

[Tainan]

"I won't try to convince you that you are wrong; you seem to have your mind made up since you accuse pit owners of being delusional like liberals. You just don't realize that you are doing the exact thing you accuse others of, reacting based on sensational stories and emotion even though you clearly (based on your quote I posted) really do not know of what you speak."

Sure. I'll pick up the gauntlet. Your reply is logical fallacy at best. And a misrepresentation of my comments.

"you seem to have your mind made up since you accuse pit owners of being delusional like liberals."

No...I have not done that. I have pointed out a noticed similarity in the responses to Chets posting of his pit bull articles to many of the looney lib responses made to the conservatives posts I have made on other forums. And, I sincerely doubt that all of the specified respondees actually own pit bulls. Can you prove me wrong?

"...You just don't realize that you are doing the exact thing you accuse others of"

I think it is very smug of you to think you know what I "realize" and what I do not "realize." Smug..and in this instance wrong and self-serving. And I "accuse" no one. I have pointed out a similarity in responses. And, I think your response to my post shows enough of the same low grade pop-psycho-analysis to fit right in there also.

"...reacting based on sensational stories and emotion even though you clearly (based on your quote I posted) really do not know of what you speak."

Its so nice that you use your self as the supporting source for this part. Unfortunately, since you are relying on an incorrect item as the basis of your support, that kind of nullifies the credibility of your point. In plain language - you got bupkiss to support yer claim.

So much for the fisking. Frankly, I made it clear what I was saying. I also indicated it was my opinion. If someone agrees with me - they win no prize. If someone disagrees with my opinion - good for them. I don't ask for either.
Its called...:drum roll:...Free Speech.
(within accepted boundaries of Free Republic)

Have a lovely and safe week-end...8)

[freekitty]

Chet should put the blame where it should be placed and that is the breeders not the dogs. They are the ones responsible for what is happening in some cases to this breed.

The dog is a good breed; but with the bad breeders breeding in aggression what did he expect to happen?

You can’t breed the bad out the dog; but you can breed the good in and that is what should be happening.