Skip to comments.
Ancestors Of African Pygmies And Neighboring Farmers Separated Around 60,000 Years Ago
ScienceDaily ^
| April 11, 2009
| Public Library of Science
Posted on 04/17/2009 1:05:22 PM PDT by SunkenCiv
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
1
posted on
04/17/2009 1:05:22 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
To: StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; 1ofmanyfree; 21twelve; 24Karet; 2ndDivisionVet; 31R1O; ...
· join list or digest · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post a topic ·
|
|
Gods Graves Glyphs
|
OTOH:
Despite Their Diversity, Pygmies Of Western Central Africa Share Recent Common Ancestors Cell Press ScienceDaily February 6, 2009 ...they diverged from a single ancestral population just about 2,800 years ago... Paul Verdu of Musee de l'Homme in Paris[:] ..."despite the fact that there is no such thing nowadays as a pygmy civilization or identity and despite their great cultural heterogeneity -- Western pygmy populations in fact do share a common origin and recently diverged from one another."
Nevertheless, pygmy populations today do not know about one another, and they have no myth or story about their own origin, Verdu emphasized. In fact, pygmies do not call themselves "Pygmies." Rather, they identify themselves as distinct ethnic groups, including Kola, Baka, Efe, or Nsua, to name a few. There is also no pygmy language. All pygmy populations speak the language of their non-pygmy neighbors, representing two different language families in Western Central Africa. To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list.
GGG managers are SunkenCiv, StayAt HomeMother, and Ernest_at_the_Beach
|
|
·Dogpile · Archaeologica · ArchaeoBlog · Archaeology · Biblical Archaeology Society · · Discover · Nat Geographic · Texas AM Anthro News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · Google · · The Archaeology Channel · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists ·
|
2
posted on
04/17/2009 1:08:10 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
To: SunkenCiv
Then how do you explain...
3
posted on
04/17/2009 1:09:03 PM PDT
by
exist
To: SunkenCiv
The same patterns we see DEVELOPING in divergent populations kept in reproductive isolation is the EXACT same pattern we see already present in species that shared a recent common ancestor.
4
posted on
04/17/2009 1:10:18 PM PDT
by
allmendream
("Wealth is EARNED not distributed, so how could it be redistributed?")
To: SunkenCiv
Well sure they were all huddled down there. Europe was a giant glacier.
5
posted on
04/17/2009 1:11:35 PM PDT
by
Tarpon
(You abolish your responsibilities, your surrender your rights.)
To: SunkenCiv
I was taught that there is more human genetic diversity in Africa than in all the rest of the world combined. It used to be said that Pygmies were so different from other people they could be called their own race.
6
posted on
04/17/2009 1:13:49 PM PDT
by
Varda
To: Varda
That is true. An African from North Africa is just as distinct by DNA from an African from East Africa as they are from a Chinese person, a European, or an Aborigine.
That being said though, we as a species have very LITTLE genetic diversity. We are all very similar to each other; as would be expected considering the very recent common ancestry of our comparatively young species.
7
posted on
04/17/2009 1:21:00 PM PDT
by
allmendream
("Wealth is EARNED not distributed, so how could it be redistributed?")
To: Varda

A few pictures of actual pygmies seemed in order. 
To: Varda
My view is, the jury is not only still out, it will never come back in. ;’)
9
posted on
04/17/2009 1:27:56 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
To: allmendream
Weird coincidence, eh? ;’)
10
posted on
04/17/2009 1:28:41 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
To: exist
He’s a doc, but mostly we call him grumpy.
11
posted on
04/17/2009 1:31:10 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
To: allmendream
I agree we are relatively homogenous but there are still distinct differences that can be measured. For instance, an African from North Africa (caucasion) is more related to Europeans than they are to Chinese and much less related to Aborigines.
I would guess the North African would be equally (distantly) related to Pygmies and Aborigines.
12
posted on
04/17/2009 1:32:04 PM PDT
by
Varda
To: SunkenCiv
The jury in in, genetic analysis is determining the relationships.
13
posted on
04/17/2009 1:34:39 PM PDT
by
Varda
To: Varda
oops-
The jury in is in
14
posted on
04/17/2009 1:35:52 PM PDT
by
Varda
To: SunkenCiv
Studies of mtDNA confirm there is a high level of internal divergence among African populations, consistent with this study. On the other hand, I wish they would use more empirical methods to drive their dating models. We know from the low levels of variation in worldwide mitochondrial DNA that all humans shared a common ancestor only a few thousand years ago (if longer, the number of variants and their spread through the population would be much greater).
These inflated ages are not the result of empirical studies of mutation rates (which demand much younger ages) but rather are based on evolutionary models and assumptions. Then they turn around and call the results evidence of evolution! It's like dealing with flat earthers who only want to talk about their landscaped lawn and keep ignoring the testimony of astronauts living around them.
The Eve Mitochondrial Consensus Sequence
15
posted on
04/17/2009 1:45:20 PM PDT
by
Liberty1970
(Democrats are not in control. God is. And Thank God for that!)
To: Varda
For instance, an African from North Africa (caucasion) is more related to Europeans than they are to Chinese and much less related to Aborigines. The people along the Mediterranean coast are relatively closely related to each other, after thousands of years of interaction and trade. Sub-Saharan Africa, OTOH, was very much isolated from North Africa, the Middle East, and Europe.
16
posted on
04/17/2009 1:58:45 PM PDT
by
PapaBear3625
(The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money -- Thatcher)
To: SunkenCiv
So which group migrated to Zambales Provence in the Philippines?
17
posted on
04/17/2009 2:00:36 PM PDT
by
bert
(K.E. N.P. +12 . John Galt hell !...... where is Francisco dÂ’Anconia)
To: bert
18
posted on
04/17/2009 2:16:59 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
To: Varda
I’ll stand by what I said — the jury will never be in.
19
posted on
04/17/2009 2:18:34 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
20
posted on
04/17/2009 2:22:41 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson