Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

This Day In Civil War History April 9, 1865 Lee Surrenders
http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history.do?action=Article&id=2165 ^

Posted on 04/09/2009 6:14:54 AM PDT by mainepatsfan

April 9, 1865 Lee surrenders

Confederate General Robert E. Lee surrenders his army to Union General Ulysses S. Grant at Appomattox Court House, Virginia.

For more than a week, Lee had tried to outrun Grant to the west of Richmond and Petersburg. After a ten-month siege of the two cities, the Union forces broke through the defenses and forced Lee to retreat. The Confederates moved along the Appomattox River, with Union General Phillip Sheridan shadowing them to the south. Lee's army had little food, and they began to desert in large numbers on the retreat. When Lee arrived at Appomattox, he found that his path was blocked. He had not choice but to request a meeting with Grant.

They met at a house in Appomattox at 2:00 p.m. on the afternoon of April 9. Lee was resplendent in his dress uniform and a fine sword at his side. Grant arrived wearing a simple soldier's coat that was muddy from his long ride. The great generals spoke of their service in the Mexican War, and then set about the business at hand. Grant offered generous terms. Officers could keep their side arms, and all men would be immediately released to return home. Any officers and enlisted men who owned horses could take them home, Grant said, to help put crops in the field and carry their families through the next winter. These terms, said Lee, would have "the best possible effect upon the men," and "will do much toward conciliating our people." The papers were signed and Lee prepared to return to his men.

In one of the great ironies of the war, the surrender took place in the parlor of Wilmer McClean's home. McClean had once lived along the banks of Bull Run, the site of the first major battle of the war in July 1861. Seeking refuge from the fighting, McClean decided to move out of the Washington-Richmond corridor to try to avoid the fighting that would surely take place there. He moved to Appomattox Court House only to see the war end in his home.

Although there were still Confederate armies in the field, the war was officially over. Four years of bloodshed had left a devastating mark on the country: 360,000 Union and 260,000 Confederate soldiers had perished during the Civil War.


TOPICS: History
KEYWORDS: leewasawarcriminal; psychokiller
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: Psalm 73
strength was at the close of hostilities? How about quantity of artillery pieces, horses, oxen?

I actually have all of that in my books, but in a word, overwhelming.

The Confederates were beaten down to almost nothing at the end had virtually nothing left but their lives.
There were not 2 spare miles of RR track in the entire Confederacy at the end.
Earlier, Sherman predicted that it would end that way.

The Union, on the other hand, benefited greatly from the Civil War, in an industrial sense.
The US industries were already starting to boom, but the war gave them a real kick in the pants.
That same war ground the CSA into the dirt.

Still it was a great testament to unflagging devotion to the cause. On both sides.

If I could muster 1/10 of that character today, we could succeed from this quagmire.

21 posted on 04/09/2009 7:35:29 AM PDT by bill1952 (Power is an illusion created between those with power - and those without)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: central_va
I guess you need to tell yourself that to justify the "butcher's" bill for "preservation".

And how do you justify all the death and destruction the South brought upon itself in its losing cause?

22 posted on 04/09/2009 7:37:18 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 73

Lee had lost a fairly large piece of his army [including Ewell and other generals] at Saylor’s Creek during the retreat. His retreat west was initially cut off by Union cavalry, but an infantry corps came up and sealed him off. I believe Lee was down to approximately 30,000 give or take, maybe 40,000 tops. Grant had probably 50,000 or more [Sheridan alone had three divisions of Cavalry]


23 posted on 04/09/2009 7:39:50 AM PDT by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NavyCanDo

Johnston surrendered to Sherman after Lee surrendered to Grant. The Trans-Mississippi surrendered after that.


24 posted on 04/09/2009 7:41:37 AM PDT by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Tell me O Northern hero, besides: Abuse of the Constitution's Commerce Clause which led to:
  1. Reverse Discrimination
  2. Gay Marriage
  3. Federally Sponsored abortion
  4. Confiscatory Income Tax
  5. Open Borders
  6. Fiat Money
  7. Welfare

What was "preservered"?

25 posted on 04/09/2009 7:44:04 AM PDT by central_va (Co. C, 15th Va., Patrick Henry Rifles-The boys of Hanover Co.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: mainepatsfan

Actually, General Lee never really surrendered. You see, he showed up to have a little chat and discuss Grant’s options. Lee was greeted at the door by a stately figure he presumed to be the butler. He handed the man his hat and sword.

When he realized that man was in fact, Ulysses Grant, he was too much of a gentlemen to dampen the ensuing celebration.


26 posted on 04/09/2009 7:46:55 AM PDT by Hatteras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mainepatsfan

The saddest day in the history of our Constitutional Republic. The day the Constitution died....


27 posted on 04/09/2009 7:48:34 AM PDT by patriot preacher (To be a good American Citizen and a Christian IS NOT a contradiction. (www.mygration.blogspot.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 73

I don’t have the exact numbers but in the Appomattox Campaign that led up to the Army of Northern Virginia’s surrender, Grant had Lee massively outnumbered in every possible measure—infantry, cavalry, artillery, supplies, everything. Plus, a few days before the surrender, part of Lee’s army had been cut off, trapped, and forced to surrender at Sayler’s Creek.

I grew up 25 miles from Appomattox and have been there many times. We learned this stuff, through osmosis if nothing else. :)

}:-)4


28 posted on 04/09/2009 7:51:10 AM PDT by Moose4 (Hey RNC. Don't move toward the middle. MOVE THE MIDDLE TOWARD YOU.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
And how do you justify all the death and destruction the South brought upon itself in its losing cause?

I am sure the Reich High Command had the same type thoughts about Poland in 1940.

29 posted on 04/09/2009 7:51:50 AM PDT by central_va (Co. C, 15th Va., Patrick Henry Rifles-The boys of Hanover Co.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: central_va
Tell me O Northern hero, besides: Abuse of the Constitution's Commerce Clause which led to...

The country, Oh Southron whiner. And I'd point out that if you have a problem with confiscatory income taxes and fiat money then you must really have problems with Jeff Davis. Also, that gay marriage is a state issue, with local courts being the ones to legalize it and state Constitutions being the vehicle to ban it. My own state of Kansas, for example, and my neighboring state of Missouri have both amended their Constitutions to ban gay marriage and I applaud their arriving at the correct solution. And speaking of state's right, abortion should be one as well, but the Supreme Court stepped in on that one with their 'right to privacy' findings. But you're really not that big on the whole "state's rights" issue, are you?

30 posted on 04/09/2009 7:55:57 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: central_va
I am sure the Reich High Command had the same type thoughts about Poland in 1940.

I'm sure they did. Are you saying that Nazi Germany and the confederacy started their wars for the same reason?

31 posted on 04/09/2009 7:57:47 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: central_va

lol


32 posted on 04/09/2009 7:57:58 AM PDT by randomhero97 ("First you want to kill me, now you want to kiss me. Blow!" - Ash)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: patriot preacher
The day the Constitution died....

How so?

33 posted on 04/09/2009 7:58:26 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: JusPasenThru
"I wonder how a divided nation would have fared aginst the Nazis of the mid-twentieth centery and the Communists of the late twentieth century."

I have often wondered the same thing. I believe that, even absent the warfare that came as a result of the rebellion, the south had neither the resources nor the infrastructure to survive the inevitable incursions by the French or British who would see the split as the perfect opportunity to acquire (or reacquire) a foothold in the Americas.

Unfortunately the split would have also left the north similarly vulnerable (but to a greatly lesser extent). Even if the south was to repel invaders the very attrition that decimated their already fragile economies would ruin them and they ultimately would either accept conquer and assimilation by foreigners or a return to the United States.

I think Ben Franklin said it best when he stated: "We must all hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang separately."
34 posted on 04/09/2009 8:36:15 AM PDT by rockrr (Global warming is to science what Islam is to religion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Moose4
"I don’t have the exact numbers...."

Thanks. hey, did any y'all read "Gettysburg" by Newt Gingrinch? Great historical novel about that campaign with a different ending.

35 posted on 04/09/2009 9:02:10 AM PDT by Psalm 73 ("Gentlemen, you can't fight in here - this is the War Room".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 73

The other two books in the series are just as good.


36 posted on 04/09/2009 9:07:50 AM PDT by mainepatsfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: mainepatsfan
"...other two books in the series..."

Titles?
All by Newt?

37 posted on 04/09/2009 10:49:19 AM PDT by Psalm 73 ("Gentlemen, you can't fight in here - this is the War Room".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 73

“Grant Comes East” and “Never Call Retreat” both by Gingrich and Forstchen.


38 posted on 04/09/2009 11:37:35 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

I’m partial to the scene of the climatic battle in the final book because I lived there for a year.


39 posted on 04/09/2009 2:13:06 PM PDT by mainepatsfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: mainepatsfan
I’m partial to the scene of the climatic battle in the final book because I lived there for a year.

Oh it's a good story and I enjoyed all three. Like most alternate history you have to suspend your beliefs just a bit. But they did a good job on it. I haven't read any of their other stuff - didn't they do an alternate history where Japan took Hawaii after Pearl Harbor?

40 posted on 04/09/2009 2:41:46 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson