Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Free America52

About the citizenship issue, Scalia told a close relative of mine that “if the electorate don’t care, why should we (the Court) get involved?”


14 posted on 03/10/2009 11:17:23 AM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Arthur McGowan

For the electorate to care, wouldn’t they first have to know about it?


15 posted on 03/10/2009 11:23:16 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Arthur McGowan

Well it appears enough of the electorate is starting to care for Scalia.


17 posted on 03/10/2009 11:27:13 AM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Arthur McGowan

You said — About the citizenship issue, Scalia told a close relative of mine that “if the electorate don’t care, why should we (the Court) get involved?”

I don’t think the case for getting Obama out of office is going anywhere, either (you’re saying this “statement” exemplifies “why” it’s going nowhere...).

But, I think it’s going nowhere — *not* on the basis of the voting public “not caring” — but rather — because no one was able to present any evidence to the Supreme Court. And besides that, the cases that they had to decide were on other issues (like “standing” for one example...).

The Supreme Court was asked to undo the election or stop the Electoral College votes or to stop the inauguration — but they refused to do any of those, because it was all based on Internet blogs and rumors and speculations and “reasonings” from certain people — but *nothing* in the way of any solid evidence for them to act.

They would act, and do something that was *within their powers* to do — if — someone brought a specific case to them with that issue to be decided and if there was specific and court-verified evidence (from lower courts) that was absolutely documented.

In the absence of all that — the Supreme will be doing *nothing* at all...

And by the way, I do not believe that statement as coming from Scalia or any other Supreme Court Justice. I believe they will do the right thing, according to the law of the land that we have, and all applicable statutes and do so regardless of any consequences. However, their power is limited right now, in regards to a sitting President. Only Congress has been delegated the power to remove a sitting President from office.


25 posted on 03/10/2009 11:52:05 AM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Arthur McGowan
Scalia told a close relative of mine that “if the electorate don’t care, why should we (the Court) get involved?”

Now that is truly a frightening statement, coming from a Supreme Court Justice.

33 posted on 03/10/2009 12:12:43 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Arthur McGowan
About the citizenship issue, Scalia told a close relative of mine that “if the electorate don’t care, why should we (the Court) get involved?”

Off hand I would say that the electorate doesn't care about most cases the SC hears.

67 posted on 03/10/2009 1:25:44 PM PDT by Faith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson