Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

This looks amazing! The other trailers were short on details but this has them and the story looks very, VERY interesting from this 45-year old geek's perspective!
1 posted on 03/06/2009 8:43:45 AM PST by Reaganesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
To: Reaganesque

Looks kind of dorky too me, but if you think it’s good you are probably right. I don’t know anything about Star Trek.


2 posted on 03/06/2009 8:44:34 AM PST by Reagan79 (Ralph Stanley & The Clinch Mountain Boys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque

I like the one where the vintage car is racing down the street. Something is chasing it with red and blue strobe lights. The car goes over the cliff and the young kid barely gets out in time.

The police vehicle is a flying machine, the cop looks like a futuristic soldier and he says “What is your name?”

The little boy stands up and proclaims proudly “My name is James Tiberius Kirk!”

THAT is a perfect scene.


3 posted on 03/06/2009 8:46:26 AM PST by GeronL (Will bankrupting America lead to socialism?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque

Bummer. I don’t do quicktime.


4 posted on 03/06/2009 8:46:50 AM PST by RobRoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque
Must have Quicktime.

Sorry, that's a deal-breaker.

5 posted on 03/06/2009 8:47:33 AM PST by KayEyeDoubleDee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque

WOW!


6 posted on 03/06/2009 8:47:39 AM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque

Maybe I am too old or not hip enough but it looks boring to me.

I’ve been getting interested in Star Trek: Enterprise on TV lately though...


7 posted on 03/06/2009 8:48:31 AM PST by ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton (To those who believe the world was safer with Saddam, get treatment for that!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque

ooooooohhhhhhhh, ping for later!!!


9 posted on 03/06/2009 8:49:34 AM PST by thefactor (yes, as a matter of fact, i DID only read the excerpt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque

Muppet Babies!


13 posted on 03/06/2009 8:52:25 AM PST by JHBowden (Keep the Change!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque

Could be interesting. Notice they’ve got the gratuitous sex thrown in for good measure......


14 posted on 03/06/2009 8:53:00 AM PST by MrLee (Sha'alu Shalom Yerushalyim!! God bless Eretz Israel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque

your link has crashed, frozen actually, this compy twice


15 posted on 03/06/2009 8:55:01 AM PST by GeronL (Will bankrupting America lead to socialism?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque

O DAMN that looks cool.

Live long and prosper!


18 posted on 03/06/2009 8:56:24 AM PST by Danae (Amerikan Unity My Ass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque
Looks like I'll have to mark the calendar.

Possibly a very interesting Star Trek movie, especially for those of us who remember when the original Star Trek came out and watched it.

20 posted on 03/06/2009 8:59:08 AM PST by Just another Joe (Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque

There’s a premise that I see a lot in the movies these days. It’s one that proposes the best leaders were the worst kids. That’s NOT a great message to send out to all the kids that will go to see this movie.

I wonder how far they will take this premise into the movie. Is he a rag tag scoundrel until he is gifted leadership? Once again, not a very good message for children viewing the movie.


21 posted on 03/06/2009 9:00:14 AM PST by DoughtyOne (Resolved: Gregg, McCain, Snowe, Spectre: 2010, Collins, Graham: 2014)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque

BTTT ( For later not-at-work viewing)


22 posted on 03/06/2009 9:01:23 AM PST by garybob (More sweat in training, less blood in combat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque

Are there any clues there on how to get the Ferringei out of the White House?


23 posted on 03/06/2009 9:07:52 AM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RikaStrom

later ping


25 posted on 03/06/2009 9:08:31 AM PST by RikaStrom (Bitter? Who me? Nah, I'm just clinging to my guns!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque

WOW!

BUMP!!!

I hope this really is FINALLY a return to the Anti-PC BC that infested star trek franchises in the last decades.


27 posted on 03/06/2009 9:19:38 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque

Garbage. Sorry. But, it is.

Hoss

:D


28 posted on 03/06/2009 9:21:05 AM PST by HossB86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque

This looks absolutely awesome! I can’t wait to see it. Syler will make a great Spock!!


29 posted on 03/06/2009 9:21:22 AM PST by TheKidster (you can only trust government to grow, consolidate power and infringe upon your liberties.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque
Wet blanket alert.

This looks like the recent attempt to re-do the classic 1960 film "The Time Machine." The 1960 original had top-rate actors, Wells' greaty story, imaginative F/X, and holds-up very well despite a small budget. The 2004 remake is huge, loud, a departure from the Wells novel, had a big budget, and is a loser that disappeared after six weeks at the box office.

Hollywood's attempt to remake iconic stories has failed 95% of the time. The new Trek contunues the trend. It is clearly a Dress Up movie: young actors (kids) playing grown-up with newer toys. The original Trek actors were stage trained and had the deep baritone voices from that training. The trailers for the new Trek show, well, basically, kids, dressed-up as Kirk, Spock, et al, backed by ILM's eye-popping but ultimately empty F/X. They have sharp, alto voices and have clearly been TV-only actors. The Trailers show the film to be the 98th remake of the same story. This presents a problem for whomever sees it. Kids watching will go for the F/X. Older folks (like me) cannot help but compare it to what has come before: good stories that relied primarily upon experienced actors and writers to hold the audience. Frankly, watching the trailers is, for me, uncompelling. I laughed at Quinto acting as Spock, frankly. Nimoy is a one-of in that role, which he played with a twinkle and from a background of years of theater. Quinto comes across as a kid auditioning for a high school production of Star Trek. The kid playing Kirk is the bratty kid you knew in junior high who always bullied the weaker kids. Some role rewrite. Sorry.

Abrams has been a greatly successful director and producer, but this film is clearly about noise and F/X, not story. Abrams has reinvented Kirk to be a dangerous misfit who is sent packing to Star Fleet before he does any more damage. This is the reverse of the original role, a man of intense but controlled feelings who felt duty and honor were the highest callings.

This movie will open big and then vanish.

30 posted on 03/06/2009 9:21:41 AM PST by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson