[Extremely Extreme Extremist]

Two things here: Number one, you were never a Coulter fan to begin with; if you were, you would know how Ann throw down. Yes, she is a flamethrower, but that's her personality. Please explain to me how that is detrimental to the conservative cause? At the end of the day, liberals are still 100x more vitriolic than Ann on her worse day. BTW - take some reading comprehension lessons and read the meaning behind Ann's words, instead of swallowing the socialist media/RINO spin.

Number two: People like you are exactly why conservatism is in the demoralized state that it's in right now. You want to play nice to people who want to see you destroyed. You want to reach out and support a President who has no business of being a tourist in Washington, let alone the fricking President. Bottom line: Jindal's speech stunk when he should have attacked Obama's policies and gave the base some red meat.

[publius_in_abq]

You need to calm down...it is detrimental to attack one of our own for such a mild reason as being polite to the POTUS. I had no problem with her criticizing Jindal for being polite to the POTUS (I too think he should have attacked more). And If Jindal was on board with the POTUS’s policies, attack him for that. But what does Slumdog Millionaire have to do with anything? How is that constructive?

[SAJ]

VERY well said, m’FRiend!