You need to calm down...it is detrimental to attack one of our own for such a mild reason as being polite to the POTUS. I had no problem with her criticizing Jindal for being polite to the POTUS (I too think he should have attacked more). And If Jindal was on board with the POTUS’s policies, attack him for that. But what does Slumdog Millionaire have to do with anything? How is that constructive?
Ok, my two cents. Don't care if you like it or not, I have gone way past the point of caring if someone on FR likes me or loves what I say. So here it is: Publius; Ann Rocks, you suck. Period. No need for a debate, no need for me to give a coherent rebuttal. You wouldn't listen anyway. You are obviously a dem plant trying to drive a wedge.
Forget it bub. Do you realize what's at stake here? Do you really want to engage people who want to destroy you with a cup of tea?
it is detrimental to attack one of our own for such a mild reason as being polite to the POTUS.
She didn't "attack" anyone, that's who Ann is. That's her personality. The last time I looked, Jindal was a grown-up who doesn't need defending.
Jindal was weak because discussing policies via reason doesn't get you anywhere in a dumbed down society.
Coulter understands this and brings a style of commentary and debate that liberals have no defense against, and thus she scares the hell out of them.
Read this article on "Coulterism".
A snippet
They do, however, hit the bulls-eye in their belief that, “Ann Coulter is a living rebuke to almost all of contemporary liberal philosophy.”
Ann is attempting to "stiffen the spine" of Jindal, and other conservative politicians. She doesn't want him playing nice nice with the enemy.
She's essentially bucking up the troops for war