[aruanan]

Homo maybe but modern NO. Humans in flesh did not exist during this time period.

If there were indisputable means of dating a footprint that looked entirely like a modern human footprint at 1.5 millions years, you would devise some reason the results couldn't be accepted because of your preexisting assumptions of what could or could not have been making prints at that time.

[Just mythoughts]

If there were indisputable means of dating a footprint that looked entirely like a modern human footprint at 1.5 millions years, you would devise some reason the results couldn't be accepted because of your preexisting assumptions of what could or could not have been making prints at that time.

When that indisputable methodology of dating anything over a few thousand years is accomplished I guess we can chat.