Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
To: San Jacinto
2 posted on
02/17/2009 2:12:59 PM PST by
HiJinx
(~ Support Our Troops ~ www.AmericaSupportsYou.mil ~)
To: San Jacinto
Should have been cleared on all charges, but this is a very good start.
At least some justice over the hordes of illegals spitting on our borders, our flag, and our good nature.
Yep, it’s a start...
3 posted on
02/17/2009 2:13:27 PM PST by
PubliusMM
(RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2013: Change we can look forward to.)
To: San Jacinto
Jury of Wimps.
Although they find no civil rights violation, they award the illegal immigrant trespassers $78,000 from the landowner. Landowner's lawyer is ‘pleased with the outcome’.
It IS better than being ordered to pay the $32,000,000 asked for by the illegals.
4 posted on
02/17/2009 2:13:31 PM PST by
San Jacinto
(gorebull warming -- the Socialists' Shortcut.)
To: San Jacinto
No violation of their “rights” but still guilty and on the hook for $78K. Madness.
5 posted on
02/17/2009 2:13:53 PM PST by
AngryJawa
(Obama's Success is America's Failure)
To: San Jacinto
four claims of assault and four claims of infliction of emotional distress Pure unadulterated BS.
More blood in the water for the MALDEF sharks...
6 posted on
02/17/2009 2:14:00 PM PST by
HiJinx
(~ Support Our Troops ~ www.AmericaSupportsYou.mil ~)
To: San Jacinto
If he did not violate their civil rights, how in the hell is he responsible for assualts and emotional distress?
This country has already began its descent into the clutches of peril.
8 posted on
02/17/2009 2:14:40 PM PST by
Ultimatum
(**"It is a poverty to decide that a child must die so that you may live as you wish." -Mother Teresa)
To: San Jacinto
But the jury did find him liable Tuesday on four claims of assault and four claims of infliction of emotional distress. The jurors ordered Barnett to pay nearly $78,000 in damages. The bulk of that is punitive.
So now a burglar or robber can sue the victim.
9 posted on
02/17/2009 2:15:02 PM PST by
Dallas59
("You know the one with the big ears? He might be yours, but he ain't my president.")
To: San Jacinto
Well, that’s just silly. They had some semblance of sanity in their grasp and then ordered him to pay damages. What is wrong with people?
10 posted on
02/17/2009 2:15:10 PM PST by
ronnyquest
("Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not." -- Thomas Jefferson)
To: San Jacinto
four claims of infliction of emotional distress I wonder how many on the jury were once illegal aliens.
11 posted on
02/17/2009 2:15:15 PM PST by
donna
(Synonyms: Feminism, Communism, Fascism, Socialism)
To: San Jacinto
But the jury did find him liable Tuesday on four claims of assault and four claims of infliction of emotional distress. The jurors ordered Barnett to pay nearly $78,000 in damages. The bulk of that is punitive. PFT...good up to that point.
The jury should have given him part of the stimulus package as a reward and an incintive to keep doing the job this f'n gubmint won't do
13 posted on
02/17/2009 2:15:38 PM PST by
Las Vegas Ron
(Obama says we should listen to our enemies, but not to Rush)
To: San Jacinto
How could he violate something they don’t have?
14 posted on
02/17/2009 2:15:50 PM PST by
txnativegop
(God Bless America! (NRA-Endowment))
To: San Jacinto
He should have shot the “wetbacks”!
15 posted on
02/17/2009 2:16:03 PM PST by
WellyP
To: San Jacinto; gubamyster; calcowgirl; Kimberly GG; cripplecreek; All
So...he didn’t violate their civil rights, but they’re going to get $78,000 out of him anyway?
God help us all.
16 posted on
02/17/2009 2:16:27 PM PST by
AuntB
(The right to vote in America: Blacks 1870; Women 1920; Native Americans 1925; Foreigners 2008)
To: San Jacinto; TigersEye
The jurors ordered Barnett to pay nearly $78,000 in damages..... I don't think the illegals deserve a dime.
17 posted on
02/17/2009 2:16:29 PM PST by
pandoraou812
(Don't play leapfrog with a unicorn! ...........^............)
To: San Jacinto
Illegal immigrants? They can be “disappeared”. Oh look, no one to cash the check now.
19 posted on
02/17/2009 2:17:24 PM PST by
Sir Gawain
(Dear President Obama, where's my free stuff?)
To: San Jacinto
He should have counter-sued them for emotional distress caused by their trespass.
23 posted on
02/17/2009 2:18:57 PM PST by
bluegirl
To: San Jacinto
Sadly, there’s a lesson here. Just as with endangered species...
“Shoot, shovel, and shut up.”
24 posted on
02/17/2009 2:19:46 PM PST by
Nervous Tick
(Party? I don't have one anymore.)
To: San Jacinto
I appeal that $78,000 judgement, AND sue the illegals for destruction of property and emotional distress.
25 posted on
02/17/2009 2:23:24 PM PST by
oneamericanvoice
(Support freedom! Support the troops! Surrender is not an option!)
To: San Jacinto
27 posted on
02/17/2009 2:23:47 PM PST by
mylife
(The)
To: San Jacinto
If he can afford these judgments, he ought to hire his own defense force. In Texas, trespassers walk into the light.
30 posted on
02/17/2009 2:28:06 PM PST by
wolfcreek
(There is no 2 party system only arrogant Pols and their handlers)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson