Skip to comments.
One Hundred Billion Trillion Habitable Planets
Centauri Dreams ^
| 2/17/09
Posted on 02/17/2009 12:15:35 PM PST by LibWhacker
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
One Hundred Billion Trillion
You've got to look to Creation to find numbers that exceed the numbers bandied about in the 'rats Great Stimulus Robbery of Ought-Eight and Nine.
To: LibWhacker
It is sort of running an experiment in your refrigerator - turn it off and something will grow in there. That's just an ill-thought out statement. There's no life in the fridge natively, and just the concept of manufactuing a fridge, plugging it in and turning it on does not mean mold will grow inside it. Someone had to drop in the leftover meatloaf.
2
posted on
02/17/2009 12:18:52 PM PST
by
AbeKrieger
(Clomppity clomp.)
To: LibWhacker
Great!!! When do we ship all the Marxist Rats to another planet???? The sooner, the better!!
3
posted on
02/17/2009 12:19:03 PM PST
by
lgjhn23
To: LibWhacker
One Hundred Billion Trillion Habitable Planets With 100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 habitable planets is it too much for me to want to be the iron-fisted (yet benevolent) ruler of just one of them?
4
posted on
02/17/2009 12:19:35 PM PST
by
MahatmaGandu
(Remember, remember, the twenty-sixth of November.)
To: LibWhacker
the number of Earth-like planets in the universe might be the same as the number of stars, a figure he pegged at one hundred billion trillion.All populated with potential taxpayers? Great...their descendents can also help pay for Nobama's "trust me" spending fiasco....
Should only take...say one hundred billion trillion generations to recover....
5
posted on
02/17/2009 12:20:37 PM PST
by
NorCoGOP
("The Change We Need" greatest typo in PR history (turned out to be "Your Change We Need"))
To: AbeKrieger
The mere presence of a refrigerator implies the presence of a refrigerator maker ;-)
6
posted on
02/17/2009 12:21:17 PM PST
by
Joe 6-pack
(Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
To: LibWhacker
If you have a habitable world and let it evolve for a few billion years then inevitably some sort of life will form on it, said Dr Boss. Awfully sloppy use of language for a scientist. A "habitable world" is not going to "evolve" for a few billion years prior to the formation of life. The whole question of How life starts is something science has not been able to address and which is outside the scope of Evolution (I've been told that about 10,000 times).
I don't like his cavalier use of "evolve" and I also hardly think that life will inevitably form out of nothing. We have no idea how that would happen.
7
posted on
02/17/2009 12:22:09 PM PST
by
ClearCase_guy
(American Revolution II -- overdue)
To: MahatmaGandu
"...is it too much for me to want to be the iron-fisted (yet benevolent) ruler of just one of them?" With that kind of ambition, you're more likely to be the recipient of a bunch of moons.
8
posted on
02/17/2009 12:22:55 PM PST
by
Joe 6-pack
(Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
To: LibWhacker
I don’t believe this conclusion and I’ve read quite a bit on the subject...but I’ve been wrong before.
9
posted on
02/17/2009 12:23:30 PM PST
by
gorush
(History repeats itself because human nature is static)
To: Joe 6-pack
10
posted on
02/17/2009 12:24:03 PM PST
by
MahatmaGandu
(Remember, remember, the twenty-sixth of November.)
To: LibWhacker
Liberals just can’t stand the fact that there may be other living beings out there that AREN’T BEING TAXED, CONTROLLED OR FORCED INTO NATIONALIZED HEALTH CARE!
11
posted on
02/17/2009 12:24:43 PM PST
by
prismsinc
(A.K.A. "The Terminator"!)
To: MahatmaGandu
12
posted on
02/17/2009 12:24:48 PM PST
by
Red in Blue PA
(If guns cause crime, then all of mine are defective.)
To: LibWhacker; All
Liberals just can’t stand the fact that there may be other living beings out there that AREN’T BEING TAXED, CONTROLLED OR FORCED INTO NATIONALIZED HEALTH CARE!
13
posted on
02/17/2009 12:24:56 PM PST
by
prismsinc
(A.K.A. "The Terminator"!)
To: lgjhn23
I think I rather be free to go pioneering myself. Even if we shipped off the rats, the stench would still be here. They probably couldn’t survive with out some one else’s pockets to reach into. Just think of the diseases they would take into a probably pristine environment.
14
posted on
02/17/2009 12:25:08 PM PST
by
oyez
(People! You're being pimped!)
To: MahatmaGandu
I’m hoping to become ruler of one of the all-female planets.
To: Red in Blue PA
16
posted on
02/17/2009 12:27:03 PM PST
by
gorush
(History repeats itself because human nature is static)
To: LibWhacker
Thats only 10exp23. They need more planets, and more time before they can expect us toe believe phrases like “a universe teeming with life.”
17
posted on
02/17/2009 12:28:58 PM PST
by
D Rider
To: LibWhacker
On the other hand, maybe no other inhabited planets.
18
posted on
02/17/2009 12:30:21 PM PST
by
count-your-change
(You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
To: Retired Greyhound
Be careful what you wish for...

Or...
19
posted on
02/17/2009 12:30:25 PM PST
by
Wyatt's Torch
(I can explain it to you. I can't understand it for you.)
To: LibWhacker
It is sort of running an experiment in your refrigerator - turn it off and something will grow in there.
It has to be contaminated first. If the inside of your fridge is sterile, you can turn it off for 500,000 years and nothing will ever grow in there. So living organisms have to be introduced to the habitable planet by some means.
20
posted on
02/17/2009 12:30:44 PM PST
by
mysterio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson