To: AvOrdVet
"In a different time and without a bunch of wussies running around, they were called... oh what is the word I'm looking for... oh yes, they would have been called Patriots... fighting for something called the Constitution!"
The problem with the argument for sedition is that most of the few prior servicemen calling for it worked mainly in offices--the kind of people who become free traitors.
123 posted on
02/14/2009 4:56:33 PM PST by
familyop
(combat engineer (combat), National Guard, '89-'96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote, http://falconparty.com/)
To: All
Interesting thread.
Preparation just in case is an idea worth considering.
124 posted on
02/14/2009 5:01:24 PM PST by
rbmillerjr
(2/6/09 The Day the Republican Party died.....Reagan's Birthday nonetheless)
To: familyop
The problem with the argument for sedition is that most of the few prior servicemen calling for it worked mainly in offices-the kind of people who become free traitors.
and how would you know the extent of someones service, just as you don't know the extent of mine... which by the way was quite extensive... ;-)
I understand your point about some of the REMFs, I have known quite a few that I would not trust behind me... but some will surprise you with their knowledge and patriotism.... I've known cooks and wrench turners that could out perform a lot of their front line peers.
One the most important things I learned in SO is never under estimate anyone! Meaning you shouldn't be throwing the traitor tag around so loosely... the British called a lot of our founders traitors... but were they?
126 posted on
02/14/2009 5:14:11 PM PST by
AvOrdVet
("Put the wagons in a circle for all the good it'll do")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson