LOL! Funny how other companies do quite well with CEOs who are less compensated. In fact, there seems to be an inverse relationship.
While I don’t like the government dictatng this, the shareholders should have been doing so...but boards have been playing quid pro quo and artificially raising officer wages and benefits far above performance.
“but boards have been playing quid pro quo and artificially raising officer wages and benefits far above performance.”
Like Jamie Gorelick’s $25 MILLION dollar haul from Fannie Mae??
BOW DOWN before your new Socialist masters, peons!!