Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: thecabal

Well, for one reason, we don’t have any major relocation facilities for an entire major metropolitan area being nuked or having a biological weapon dropped on it. That — just by itself — is *well past the time* for having major relocation disaster camps for a major metropolitan area. We’ve been *unprepared* for *way too long* now.

The major terrorist attack is coming. It’s just “when”..., as the only question. I think we’re living on “borrowed time” right now...


56 posted on 02/01/2009 7:44:05 PM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: Star Traveler

But the terrorist attack relocation angle is explicitly stated in the text of the bill. Why do they need Sec. 2(b)(4)?


60 posted on 02/01/2009 7:47:00 PM PST by thecabal (Keep The Change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson