To: Free ThinkerNY
2 posted on
01/23/2009 3:41:27 PM PST by
Adams
To: Free ThinkerNY
the spin of a particle or the polarization of a photon, is transferred from one place to another, without traveling through any physical medium.
If true teleportation of people ever becomes possible it would lead to some interesting moral questions. Since no matter is actually being transferred, you would end up with a copy in a sense. The star trek transporters we think of would basically have to vaporize the original.
At least that's my take on it. More interestin stuff fer ponderin.
3 posted on
01/23/2009 3:43:24 PM PST by
cripplecreek
(The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
To: Free ThinkerNY
I volunteer Barack Obama to go first.
4 posted on
01/23/2009 3:47:31 PM PST by
exist
To: Free ThinkerNY
My sisters house has wifi
5 posted on
01/23/2009 3:49:57 PM PST by
GeronL
(DAY 4, YEAR 0 - Obama and the Groupie Corps "I can't hang with ya, if yo dogs keep axin ma' stuff')
To: Free ThinkerNY
What the big goal here is not just secure communications, but doing so over increasing distances.
For instance, at the speed of light, just communicating with someone on Mars would be delayed anywhere from 3 to 22 minutes, unless a quantum communications device was used.
But this raises a question: can such communications defeat causality? So far, the answer seems to be “no”.
To: Free ThinkerNY
Without going into a lot of detail:
The article seems to discuss this in terms of information transfer. Seems like part of the information transferred would be the kinetic energy level of the original ion.
If the transfer occurs over any substantial distance north and south, seems like the kinetic energy level will be out of sync with the location transferred to unless the information is altered to allow for that. If they can alter the information transferred, that makes for interesting possibilities.
9 posted on
01/23/2009 3:57:33 PM PST by
KrisKrinkle
(Blessed be those who know the depth and breadth of their ignorance. Cursed be those who don't.)
To: Free ThinkerNY
Superluminal?
Probably.
Einstein was wrong.
11 posted on
01/23/2009 3:59:13 PM PST by
djf
To: nnn0jeh
12 posted on
01/23/2009 4:01:06 PM PST by
kalee
(01/20/13 The end of an error.)
To: Free ThinkerNY
What do you call a person who’s atoms are all separated?
Dead.
Even if you put them back together.
13 posted on
01/23/2009 4:01:42 PM PST by
RobRoy
(Islam is a greater threat to the world today than Nazism was in the 1930's.)
To: AdmSmith; bvw; callisto; ckilmer; dandelion; ganeshpuri89; gobucks; KevinDavis; Las Vegas Dave; ...
20 posted on
01/23/2009 7:44:47 PM PST by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
To: Free ThinkerNY
23 posted on
01/23/2009 8:23:05 PM PST by
TChad
To: markman46; AntiKev; wastedyears; ALOHA RONNIE; RightWhale; anymouse; Brett66; SunkenCiv; ...
31 posted on
01/24/2009 5:39:06 PM PST by
KevinDavis
(Thomas Jefferson: A little rebellion now and then is a good thing)
To: Free ThinkerNY
To: Free ThinkerNY
But can you duplicate the soul?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson