Andrew Hicks, reflected in and among mirrors he has designed. The one in the
middle, with Inquirer print readable, is a non-reversing mirror.
To: LibWhacker
2 posted on
01/19/2009 2:40:42 AM PST by
Woodman
("One of the most striking differences between a cat and a lie is that a cat has only nine lives." PW)
To: LibWhacker
3 posted on
01/19/2009 2:59:38 AM PST by
allmost
To: LibWhacker
Hicks hopes to sell his design overseas, where it would be allowed - reasoning that a motorist might prefer to see more things, even if they are smaller. (U.S. rules do allow curved mirrors on the passenger side, but they must include the warning "Objects in Mirror Are Closer Than They Appear.")Good luck, Professor, the Europeans have had this sort of mirror (for the driver's side) for years. It's the US government's foolish regulations that are behind the curve.
4 posted on
01/19/2009 3:01:04 AM PST by
Fresh Wind
(Hey, Obama! Where's my check?)
To: LibWhacker
Could math provide the path to better reflection?
I like mirrors aka The Looking Glass.
There is something revealing in them, in a mystical sort of way.
But, forget about inventing the Disco Ball dude, it's already happened !
7 posted on
01/19/2009 3:27:51 AM PST by
SouthDixie
(We are but angels with one wing, it takes two to fly.)
To: LibWhacker
Shaving with that nonreversing mirror could be problematic.
9 posted on
01/19/2009 4:24:00 AM PST by
Larry Lucido
(I was predestined to be an Arminian but am considering choosing Calvinism.)
To: neverdem; SunkenCiv; snarks_when_bored; The_Reader_David
10 posted on
01/19/2009 4:40:41 AM PST by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: LibWhacker
11 posted on
01/19/2009 4:43:08 AM PST by
Centurion2000
(To protect and defend ... against all enemies, foreign and domestic .... by any means necessary.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson