Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: KoRn

I may be wrong but you cant NAT VPN traffic. Its possible but its a very very problematic setup. Better not to do it at the client level.


8 posted on 01/16/2009 9:23:53 PM PST by N3WBI3 (Ah, arrogance and stupidity all in the same package. How efficient of you. -- Londo Mollari)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: N3WBI3
"Better not to do it at the client level."

We do Lan2Lan(Site To Site), VPN tunnels with all of the sites that are directly affiliated with us(under our ownership). Yet those are a minority. We have so many other remote offices that are not managed by us that use the VPN client to access our network. We HAVE to have the ability for those users to be able to access our network using multiple clients. Nearly all of them don't have a perimeter device capable of handling a site to site tunnel. If all else fails, we can always take the Cisco VPN Concentrator from our old WAN connection all of them currently use, and throw it on our new one. Just configure it, and change the peer addresses on all of the tunnels and we are good to go(this was my initial suggestion but my director enjoys stressing me). That would be too easy though... and we bought the new ASA for our new WAN connection, so we hope to use it for our remotes.

9 posted on 01/16/2009 9:37:23 PM PST by KoRn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson