I’m confused, and obviously out of the loop.
To me, ‘art’ is a baby’s smile, a grove of pine covered with snow, a clear, starry night, a coyote’s howl, the green eye of a cat up close, a sunrise or sunset. A snowflake.
Is this ‘art’ supposed to FLATTER 0bama? Or is it depicting him as the commie he is, based on the fact that this obvious NEA-Grant receiver riped off art from the 1920’s & 30’s depicting commies?
Someone please enlighten me.
Anti-Americanism, anti-Judeo-Chistian, and Communism is a core of Obama’s support, so they view this as a good thing.
Good is evil.
Evil is good.
Our current best shot is that the self-serving Washingtonians (they are not Americans) bog the whole communist revolution down in red tape and self-serving power grabs.
Art has no other purpose than itself. An artist has no other purpose than Art.
He isn’t an artist, he is a commie pinko propagandist. Molotov!
Apparently you can kill millions and be lauded as a hero. Who would’ve known.
“enlighten me”
No prob:
http://www.amazon.com/Art-New-History-Paul-Johnson/dp/0297829289
Johnson described art as anything that appeals to a persons sense of the sublime.
Good book, by the way.
This weirdo isn’t an artist, although the left will try to pass him off as such.
He makes propaganda, that makes him a propagandist.