[metmom]

I am afraid it is. To reject the ToE because one does not like its conclusions is the same as rejecting physics because a close relative fell off a building.

Not exactly. I'm with sopater on this one. The thought that one doesn't accept the ToE is because of a lack of understanding of it doesn't wash.

I understand where scientists are coming from with it, I understand how they think that the evidence supports it, I just don't agree with their conclusions.

It's just too improbable that it could have happened without any intelligent impetus. I also do not see how science has disproved the creation of the world and life by God.

And there is the faith factor. I've found God reliable in so many areas that to trust Him in an area where there is controversy, is not a big stretch.

[freedumb2003]

I understand where scientists are coming from with it, I understand how they think that the evidence supports it, I just don't agree with their conclusions.

I mean this seriously, mm -- what is your conclusion of 3VL vs 2VL in the Relational Model? Date or Codd? And what of the 0-tuple and 0-attribute relations? And relvars versus relations as a connotation?

I am not wising off -- I am asking if you have the background to discuss these subjects. And I ask that you answer my simple questions about TRM before proceeding to a more complex subject such as TToE (which, I remind you, is not dependent on abiogenesis).

[freedumb2003]

I also do not see how science has disproved the creation of the world and life by God.

It has never done so, nor shall it attempt to do disprove these. I am 100% sure God created this wonderful Universe and the more we learn the more in wonder I am at His might -- and love.