Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: metmom
And I'd bet that most of the EVOS banned weren't really scientists either.

That would be an extremely safe bet. Most scientists are honest enough to admit that there is indeed a line between what is know and what is not know; what is science and what is not science; what can be tested and what cannot be tested. They won't stoop to levying personal attacks in order to defend their faith, and they won't call their faith "science".
79 posted on 01/13/2009 10:28:01 AM PST by Sopater (I'm so sick of atheists shoving their religion in my face.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]


To: Sopater
That would be an extremely safe bet.

Actually, most of them are scientists. I am one of the few who is not a scientist by profession.

Most scientists are honest enough to admit that there is indeed a line between what is know and what is not know; what is science and what is not science; what can be tested and what cannot be tested.

Are you suggesting that TTOE is not accepted by scientists?

They won't stoop to levying personal attacks in order to defend their faith, and they won't call their faith "science".

I am not quite sure where you are going here. As far as personal attacks, we have some great examples on this very thread of which "side" used personal attacks and insults as their mode of debate. In fact, if I read your last comment correctly, that is also an attempt to insult people who understand TTOE.

But I shant comment on the CREVO wars any more. It was the past. I will ask that people be civil and I promise to do the same.

85 posted on 01/13/2009 2:53:05 PM PST by freedumb2003 (Der neuen Fuhrer: AKA the Murdering Messiah: Keep your powder dry, folks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson