So you have no data to support your assertion. Merely a seat-of-the-pants feel.
”If you are saying the science community is somehow skewed from the general populace, it is YOUR responsibility to show statistics I am wrong.”
You made the assertion. It’s your responsibility to support it. Obviously, you can’t. If you could you wouldn’t turn aggressive, delve into motive-questioning, become accusatory, and resort to an appeal to authority (in this case, your own). If you’re the scientist you claim to be, you know that none of these are acceptable procedures.
”Is there a point to your post?”
Yes. To discover if you know what you’re talking about, or if you are simply blowing smoke. To this point it’s all blow and no show. Also your Christian forbearance is slipping.
”As far as the "who understand TToE, I put that in there to exclude the extreme and tiny population of non-Life Sciences scientists who do not understand TToE. It is there for clarity.”
Thanks for the clarification. And, thanks for your response.
So there is no point to your post vis a vis the discussion. But you may note I continue to be polite.
Thank you for responding and have a great evening.