Posted on 01/07/2009 6:01:51 AM PST by ShadowAce
I started in DOS at age 11, and now nearly 20 years later with a professional career in software development I can honestly say that I am completely unimpressed with the mass of Linux derivatives and their clunky and/or non-existent UI and completely ambiguous error messages.
If Linux developers want people to use their creations they need to understand how a typical computer user operates. If they don’t want Linux to operate like Windows that’s fine, but they do need to make it a non-hemorrhoid-inducing activity to get something as simple as a notepad installed; much less, something as complex as WINE.
Mark
bttt
Linux apps don't exactly hold a monopoly on ambiguous error messages. Enjoy this screen capture of an error I received from ClearCase:
A better alternative than Linux is OpenSolaris. Its real UNIX based on Sun’s Solaris 10 operating system. OpenSolaris is open source. There is lots of free software and it has the GNOME desktop from Linux.
I am in complete agreement with you on this. As such, I will warn you that you will be flamed for your heretical statements.
??? When did you last check out GNOME or KDE?
...they do need to make it a non-hemorrhoid-inducing activity to get something as simple as a notepad installed; much less, something as complex as WINE.
uh, stuff like notepad comes pre-installed, just like windows. As far as installing complex applications, a simple command like "yum install " or "apt-get install " searches the web for the the program, downloads it and all needs prerequisites, and performs all the necessary installation without any further input from the user.
It must've been quite some time ago that you last looked at Linux.
Funny thing is the biggest MS haters are the ones who don’t know how to use a computer correctly.
Does Linux have a device driver for my(or any) wireless eithernet usb device? I have a link sys.
I see the solution to a lot of the Linux problem in doing two things. First of all, put the OS on a chip, including WINE.
Then create an applications organizational structure based on desired applications and computer resources, that orders, downloads, and installs applications for maximum efficiency. This would be done online for the user.
The end result would be something like an ancient batch file, but a drive image as well. Modified with each software addition or deletion to have the best possible system.
Please define "correctly" here.
I believe that the Linux community must come to terms with the fact that their products must address the issues you point out.
Sadly, the approach of stating, or at least implying strongly, that the average “windoze” users aren't as smart as Linux users remains prevalent.
I hope that the Linux community can find their way past this problem eventually. Watching the evolution of Linux over the years, I think that some of the developers are beginning to “get it”, but it will still take a while.
I enjoy driving a stick-shift vehicle. It's fun to manually control the acceleration, deceleration, torque curve, etc., but my wife (who has, and can drive one) is only interested in owning an automatic. Why? Because she sees the vehicle as simply a means to an end (i.e., getting from here to there without giving any thought to the vehicle).
I could spend a lot of time repeating how much more control over the vehicle she could have, how much more enjoyable it would be, etc. But that would only be received by her as smug and irritating, and it certainly wouldn't change her mind.
I think that Linux devotees continuing to “talk down” to users of windows (or other GUI-faced programs), will only come across as smug and condescending.
I don't think “command line” inputs are ever going to overcome GUI clicking for the average PC user.
It seems that Linux is more for hobbyists than for practical computing.
There are too many flavors and no real direction.
I have played around with a few of the LiveCD versions. Most of them have failed to recognize all of my PC peripherals.
I have considered buying a cheap PC just to play around with Linux, but so far, I don't see much advantage to that.
[I started with DOS/MSDOS in the early 80s. I went kicking-and-screaming into Windows in the early 90s because that was the direction business environments were going.]
Take a look at Ubuntu 8.04LTS. I’m trying it out as a Windows replacement and its pretty slick. It runs perfectly on my Dell laptop and I have yet to need the command line.
Linux junkies berate Ubuntu as a “beginners” or dumbed-down distro, but that’s because one can do most everything using the GUI instead of command-line. I consider that a plus.
People should stick with the system they like and that works for them.
This article was not meant as a way of saying everyone should switch to Linux. It was meant as a caveat to those who are considering the switch that there is more to it than merely popping in a disk and then doing the same things they've always done.
That would be without screwing it up, getting it infected or installing 400 browser toolbars and then wondering "Why is the interweb so slow?".
That’s a Rational product for ya. Been a Rational Test Manager/Robot user for > 10 years. They fix nothing, and add features that the REAL users of their products would never use.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.