Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Southern Strategy was it racist???
http://forums.projectcovo.com/showthread.php?t=1439721&page=3 ^

Posted on 01/04/2009 3:26:14 PM PST by chevydude26

so i'm posting on a forum arguing over how the southern strategy wasn't necessarily racist but that republican policies are race neutral so therefore it was just a consequence that racists would choose the race neutral party over the party of welfare...

but then somebody mentions kevin phillips and it seems his comments were pretty intentional...but I also find out he wrote anti-bush books and isn't a real conservative...how should I respong...i'm slystallion26 by the way


TOPICS: History
KEYWORDS: gop; racism; southernstrategy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: ClearCase_guy
My own opinion is that the National Socialists had an exclusively Collectivist viewpoint (group identity politics) and cared nothing for Individual rights, so I have to place them on the Left.

Does not the fact that the Nazis proclaimed themselves to be collectivist and socialist prove the point? They placed themselves on the left.

21 posted on 01/04/2009 5:15:46 PM PST by slowhandluke (It's hard work to be cynical enough in this age)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: slowhandluke
That works for me. However, I imagine you've heard leftists make the argument that National Socialism was merely a name chosen to fool the gullible. They weren't really socialists, you see. But, as a political recruiting tool, they called themselves socialists so that the real socialists would vote for them.

Everyone knows that "National Socialists == Evil" concept and this necessarily leads to the conclusion that these lying SOBs just HAD to be rightwing.

'Cause the Left are the good guys. Right???

22 posted on 01/04/2009 6:11:26 PM PST by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: chevydude26
...i know that and pointed that out but according to them anything before 1964 doesn’t matter...1964 is the pivotal year in which Republicans provided the margin for the passage of the Civil Rights Act which many southern Democrats opposed - so if a lot of southerners transferred to the Republicans after that it's hard to see why they'd be labeled "racists" - in fact many of them changed parties because they saw Democrats supporting the worst elements of that Act - the quotas/special favors which it was leading toward - even Hubert Humphrey, sponsor of the bill, was so concerned that he promised that if it ever lead to special treatment for any minority he would "eat a copy of the bill" - he didn't live long enough to keep his promise......
23 posted on 01/04/2009 7:09:20 PM PST by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: chevydude26

Not racist, just deceitful, as the GOP never carried out its pledges. Too many Democrats from everywhere to stop them even had they been willing to do as they said


24 posted on 01/04/2009 7:12:04 PM PST by Theodore R. (GWB is neither "compassionate nor conservative.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson