Posted on 01/02/2009 1:16:10 PM PST by patriot08
Ed Hale of Plains Radio has secured a copy of the Dunham/Obama divorce decree as promised. He has registered this at the courthouse and has turned the document over to lawyers who are reported to be happy and enthused over the contents.
This is the first page. This is all that can be divulged at this time as those who have seen the decree are sworn to silence. You may hear information about it tonight on Ed's plainsradio show.
thanks for the updates. Appreciated them.
Night Buckeye - thanks for keeping me informed.
Not at all and this divorce document that Ed came up with is enough legal proof to deny that assertion. It shows Obama Sr. to be the birth father by law. It wouldn't matter at all if the sperm daddy was someone else.
Thanks very much for your updates and posts. Greatly appreciated. Have a great night.
I know that you can look up the historical ownership of houses, but how do we know the owners didn’t rent it out?
Because the people that have lived next door since pre- 1961 said they never lived there .
I expect you hear that more than most. ;^)
No, about the birth certificate having the number blocked out.
The Lawyer says you cannot accept that as valid because it has been altered. Of course I’d assume the original wasn’t altered, but if that is his “proof”, his “proof” is invalid.
Yes, the question does come down to “can you prove it” — and — if you can’t (i.e., everyone that is trying) then it’s like President Arthur, who became President under those doubts.
It’s still a few days away from January 20th, so he’s not quite like President Arthur yet... There’s still time to come up with some definite proof, if there is any (and that’s a real good question...).
So, in any case, you’re saying that if it’s not proven that Obama is not eligible, then it will be like Arthur, because it was never proven for him either — right?
Or, maybe in a more limited sense — as long as it’s “not proven at the present” that Obama is not qualified, then he can go on and be President in the same way President Arthur was (*again* given that no proof has come up “yet”)...
What date did she go to U of Washington? (I can’t remember). They weren’t married until Feb 2, 1961. Of course that means she was showing then. You’d think SOMEONE at the University of Hawaii would remember Barack Obama having a wife for crying out loud!
Ann Durken possible AKA
could it be that the Dunhams are not the Dunhams and changed the whole family's name? or used it back and forth for whatever reason.
I STILL didn’t listen to my own rule.
You owe me a new keyboard.
Web X... good grief.
Ann Durken may be the AKA.
FWIW
You’re welcome, Oorang. Here’s one more comment:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2157797/posts?page=725#725
The opposition failed to prove their case, and so Chester Arthur did his term without incident. We only would have had a Constitutional crisis if Arthur was proven to be ineligible during his term of office and he defiantly refused to step down.
Similarly, there needs to be some proof brought forth that Obama is not a natural-born citizen. Until that actually happens, he becomes President.
I don’t think they had photocopiers back then, did they? I know up until the 80’s, smaller offices still had carbon in between pages.
BUT, if they show a point of entry on August 8th, and show a newborn baby coming with her. It would be highly unlikely that a person could get from Hawaii to Kenya back to Baltimore in four days, given a day or two recovery from childbirth.
Obongo has to know where it could be. (bc)
What’s to prevent him sending his thugs there ahead to bride or threaten to prevent its release?
Ed is charting his own course. As I said before in a previous post; I find Ed's motive or intent genuine and just.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.