Sounds like Dawkins et al like to talk to themselves.
I should think the burden of proof would be on these men. Isn't it interesting that there are so few of them, and so many believers? Thinking of this always makes me want to ask them what their proof is for their beliefs, if they are just taking that belief on faith, and to ask how they can prove the existence of their minds, since they can't see their minds nor can they touch, hear, or taste them (wavy lines on a 'scope screen don't prove anything except electrical activity, boys). I'm just sayin': I'd rather be in my position than theirs when I die. If I'm wrong, nothing will happen. If THEY are wrong, on the other hand...