Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Police Get The Wrong House In Galveston, Allegedly Assault 12-Year-Old Girl
HoustonPress ^ | Wed Dec 17, 2008 | Chris Vogel

Posted on 12/18/2008 8:47:12 PM PST by Daffynition

It was a little before 8 at night when the breaker went out at Emily Milburn's home in Galveston. She was busy preparing her children for school the next day, so she asked her 12-year-old daughter, Dymond, to pop outside and turn the switch back on.

As Dymond headed toward the breaker, a blue van drove up and three men jumped out rushing toward her. One of them grabbed her saying, "You're a prostitute. You're coming with me."

Dymond grabbed onto a tree and started screaming, "Daddy, Daddy, Daddy." One of the men covered her mouth. Two of the men beat her about the face and throat.

As it turned out, the three men were plain-clothed Galveston police officers who had been called to the area regarding three white prostitutes soliciting a white man and a black drug dealer.

All this is according to a lawsuit filed in Galveston federal court by Milburn against the officers. The lawsuit alleges that the officers thought Dymond, an African-American, was a hooker due to the "tight shorts" she was wearing, despite not fitting the racial description of any of the female suspects. The police went to the wrong house, two blocks away from the area of the reported illegal activity, Milburn's attorney, Anthony Griffin, tells Hair Balls.

After the incident, Dymond was hospitalized and suffered black eyes as well as throat and ear drum injuries.

Three weeks later, according to the lawsuit, police went to Dymond's school, where she was an honor student, and arrested her for assaulting a public servant. Griffin says the allegations stem from when Dymond fought back against the three men who were trying to take her from her home. The case went to trial, but the judge declared it a mistrial on the first day, says Griffin. The new trial is set for February.

"I think we'll be okay," says Griffin. "I don't think a jury will find a 12-year-old girl guilty who's just sitting outside her house. Any 12-year-old attacked by three men and told that she's a prostitute is going to scream and yell for Daddy and hit back and do whatever she can. She's scared to death."

Since the incident more than two years ago, Dymond regularly suffers nightmares in which police officers are raping and beating her and cutting off her fingers, according to the lawsuit. Griffin says he expects to enter mediation with the officers in early 2009 to resolve the lawsuit.

We've got calls in to the officers' lawyer; we'll let you know if we hear something.

Update: This is from the officers' lawyer, William Helfand:

Both the daughter and the father were arrested for assaulting a peace officer. "The father basically attacked police officers as they were trying to take the daughter into custody after she ran off."

Also, "The city has investigated the matter and found that the conduct of the police officers was appropriate under the circumstances," Helfand says. "It's unfortunate that sometimes police officers have to use force against people who are using force against them. And the evidence will show that both these folks violated the law and forcefully resisted arrest."


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Military/Veterans; Society
KEYWORDS: crime; donutwatch; falsearrest; jbt; jbts; streetganginblue; thugswithbadges
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last
To: Daffynition
"The city has investigated the matter and found that the conduct of the police officers was appropriate under the circumstances," Helfand says.

No.

41 posted on 12/18/2008 11:59:59 PM PST by TigersEye (I threw my shoe at Mohammed and hit Allah in the butt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol; pandoraou812
I hear one of my girls scream Daddy Daddy and three men are around her,
they wont have time to pull their badges or identify themselves.

Yes.

42 posted on 12/19/2008 12:02:31 AM PST by TigersEye (I threw my shoe at Mohammed and hit Allah in the butt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: prismsinc
Vigilantism is going to become commonplace in America.

If this story, as written, is true, the "arresting officers" would very much need to be on the receiving end of some frontier justice. If respect for the law won't stop them from things like this, and respect for the rights of citizens won't stop them from things like this, then the fear of retaliation certainly should.
43 posted on 12/19/2008 12:16:06 AM PST by fr_freak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition

Some 12-year-old prostitutes can dress in such a way that they look much older.


44 posted on 12/19/2008 12:30:33 AM PST by Lancey Howard (/sarc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeaHawkFan
Appears the attorney is a slime ball.

LOL, noooo....!

45 posted on 12/19/2008 12:32:40 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: prismsinc
Vigilantism is going to become commonplace in America.

Jackbooted thugs like this deserve all they get.

46 posted on 12/19/2008 1:06:49 AM PST by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mockingbyrd

Yeah - and a google search only comes up with other blogs that reference this Hair Balls article. This might be one of those “fake but accurate” stories. For the sake of the little girl - I hope so.


47 posted on 12/19/2008 1:21:54 AM PST by 21twelve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: DeLaine; prismsinc; MPJackal; StolarStorm; Aliska; PLMerite; oust the louse; smokingfrog; ...
More on the Dymond Milburn case; indeed question the authenticity of the story and allegations and then if they are true, ask yourself why the MSN hasn't picked up on it.

Thursday, December 18th, 2008

So there’s been quite a bit of discusion around the Internet on the Dymond Milburn case since I posted on this Houston Press story this afternoon. I guess if you aren’t used to these sorts of stories, it can seem a little implausible. Which is why more than a few commenters at various sites have raised the possibility that the whole thing is a hoax. If it is, it’s quite a hoax. Like, on a Tawana Brawley scale.

So let’s clarify some misconceptions…

It’s all a hoax.

The lawsuit is very real. It was filed in August of this year. Here’s a write-up from the Courthouse News Service from the day it was filed. Here’s a copy (pdf) of the complaint. If this is a hoax, Milburn, her family, and her attorney are going to great lengths to pull it off. Yes, her complaint likely paints what happened in a light quite favorable to her, and unfavorable to the police. But I’d be very surprised if the major components of the complaint weren’t true.

This happened two years ago. Why are you posting about it now?

The incident happened in August 2006. The lawsuit was filed in August of this year. Milburn’s attorney tipped off Houston Press reporter Chris Vogel, who wrote about the case yesterday. I saw Vogel’s story, and blogged about the case today.

This is just one version of events, from Milburn’s lawyer.

Yes, and I made that clear in the post. After I put up the post and talked to Vogel on the phone, he posted a response from the police officers’ lawyer, William Helfand. You can read that here.

Here’s what isn’t in dispute: Milburn was wrongly targeted during a prostitution raid. The police were looking for white prostitutes. Milburn is black. She was apprehended by plain-clothes narcotics officers who emerged from a van as she stood outside her home. She resisted. The police have acknowledged they targeted the wrong house. Three weeks later, Milburn was arrested at her school, in front of her classmates, for “assaulting a public official.” At some point, her father was arrested on a similar charge. The judge declared a mistrial on the first day of Milburn’s trial. According to Vogel, she’s scheduled to be tried again in February.

Milburn and her family are now suing the police officers who apprehended her. They claim she was severely beaten during the raid. According to the compliant, two hours after the raid, Milburn’s parents took her to a hospital, where doctors documented a host of nasty injuries. I haven’t seen documentation of the hospital stay or the injuries, but if that’s all included in the complaint, I would assume it exists.

I called the Galveston police department and the Galveston district attorney’s office for comment. I haven’t yet heard back from either.

Milburn has profiles on social networking sites that say she’s 17. That means she would have been 15 at the time of the raid, not 12.

I’m not linking to a minor’s social networking page, particularly a minor who may have been the victim of abuse. She doesn’t need a bunch of crazies trying to contact her. Use Google, or check the comments if you’re interested, but yes, she does state in one of her profiles that she’s 17. My guess is that Milburn exaggerated her age, as teenage girls sometimes do on the Internet. This high school track and field results page, found by a commenter, says she was born in 1993. If her birthday falls later in the year than August, she would have been 12 at the time of the raid, as indicated in the complaint.

If it’s true, why hasn’t an outrageous story like this been picked up by the national media?

Why don’t 90 percent of the abuses of power we look at on this site get covered by the national media? The lawsuit was filed in August of an election year. A single instance of police misconduct in Galveston at that time would have quite a few other stories to compete with. As to why the story wasn’t covered in 2006, Vogel tells me the raid took place in a low-income neighborhood. I would guess that after a traumatic experience like that, and after the seemingly retributive arrest, the family was either too frightened to take their story to the media, or couldn’t get anyone to listen when they did.

I’ll post more information on this case as I learn of it.

48 posted on 12/19/2008 3:41:38 AM PST by Daffynition ("Beauty is in the sty of the beholder." ~ Joe 6-pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DeLaine; prismsinc; MPJackal; StolarStorm; Aliska; PLMerite; oust the louse; smokingfrog; ...
Sorry ...I didn't make the link to the info above .... yes, it's another blog.
49 posted on 12/19/2008 3:47:23 AM PST by Daffynition ("Beauty is in the sty of the beholder." ~ Joe 6-pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition

Too bad Daddy didn’t blow the ba**ards to kingdom come.


50 posted on 12/19/2008 4:37:24 AM PST by realdifferent1 (We've tried the soap box, jury box and ballot box. Only one box left and it's time to use it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4rcane

You will get disagreement from me. I merely said the attorney was a sliome ball. Does not mean I am siding with the police; not at all. Even slime ball lawyers sometimes represent clients with good cases.


51 posted on 12/19/2008 4:45:33 AM PST by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: SeaHawkFan

Make that NO disagreement. It’s early here.


52 posted on 12/19/2008 4:46:04 AM PST by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: All

I didn’t mean this was satire, I was tired and didn’t make that clear. I mean JS could write about this with his trademark style, not that it was satire. It’s just that crazy.


53 posted on 12/19/2008 4:50:11 AM PST by DeLaine (You can't make up anything anymore. The world itself is a satire. All you're doing is recording it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition

This is Houston, after all.


54 posted on 12/19/2008 5:46:58 AM PST by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mockingbyrd
Arrested at the time of the incident: the cops may believe they have a case

Arrested three weeks later for "assaulting a public official": It's "plead guilty to a reduced charge, we'll agree to no penalty, and this all goes away"

55 posted on 12/19/2008 8:38:50 AM PST by Oztrich Boy (Kill the English their concept of individual rights might undermine the power of our beloved tyrants)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition

One of these days they are going to get shot...


56 posted on 12/19/2008 8:41:09 AM PST by dbz77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition

Thanks for the information. Although I would have preferred it to be a hoax for the sake of the little girl. And in your post from the blog - I’m not sure what difference it makes if she were 12 or 15 at the time of the arrest!?

Interesting takes on the story looking at some of the blog sites. One site, looks like some wacko religous forum (like that Westboro “church” nutcase) blames the girl because she was wearing such a short skirt or shorts!


57 posted on 12/19/2008 11:02:17 AM PST by 21twelve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: 21twelve

It irks that there was an obvious mistake by the LEOs and for them to come back with the resisting arrest charge appears to be over the top.

If in fact, she is a honor student, to arrest her at school was uncalled for.


58 posted on 12/19/2008 11:27:16 AM PST by Daffynition ("Beauty is in the sty of the beholder." ~ Joe 6-pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition

Fire everyone involved with charging this girl or her father with anything.


59 posted on 12/19/2008 11:30:27 AM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Just shaking my head, thinking what Joe would have done if this happened to Sassy.


60 posted on 12/19/2008 11:45:53 AM PST by pandoraou812 (Don't play leapfrog with a unicorn! ...........^............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson