Benefits: long term production, export market, stable jobs. If detroit won't do it, maybe Japan, India, China or Brasil will. Again, proven platform, chassis, frame, transmission, axles, ect. It's a start. Combine with best available milage technology, KISS (keep it simple stupid) repair technology/ and a long term committment to quality, and an absolute winner line will result.
Hello?
When you talk about a dual-fuel vehicle; able to run 100% alcohol or 100% gasoline, or any mixture; or even LPG (which would really be a triple-fuel deal) you are talking about a phenomenally complex fuel system, whether you are talking about a carbuerated or injected engine. You’re talking about a multi-thousand dollar incremental price change.
I think it would be fine to go say a 3-4 year “no changes” theme for most cars and certainly trucks, but much beyond that and we might as well go all the way over to reissuing Trabants and Yugos.
What the hell are you trying to say?
I had a 1979 Ford F250 once.
It was one of the WORST vehicles I have EVER owned. The extended cab rusted away almost completely. It was a wheazing, underpowered (351M V-8) piece of crap and its automatic transmission was balky and difficult.
It had poor ride quality and handled like a TANK as opposed to a truck.
That truck is the vehicle that STILL puts me off of Ford products.
And you want to make it again? have at it, my friend, but COUNT ME OUT!
Bunny. Pancake.
