Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did we " steal " Texas, Arizona, N.Mex and Calif. from Mexico ? ( Vanity )

Posted on 11/26/2008 2:27:17 PM PST by sushiman

My left-wing radical friend insists we stole all this land from Mexico . Any history buffs out there in Freeperland who can supply some ammo for me ?


TOPICS: History; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: arizona; california; mexico; nevada; newmexico; oregon; texas; utah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-106 next last
To: sushiman

BTW the people who say California and the southwest was stolen probably read ‘the peoples history of the united states’ by noted communist Howard Zinn . Zinn has used taxpayer money in the most corrupt and cynical way to foment the overthrow of the US government and besmear America and Americans.


61 posted on 11/26/2008 3:19:38 PM PST by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sushiman

Yes, we took those states from Mexico, as the Mexicans took their land from Spain before that, and Spain took land from the Aztecs and Maya before that, and the Aztecs took land from the Toltecs, and the Maya took land from the Olmecs and Zapotecs before that, and on and on and on. This has been the way of mankind from the beginning. Tell you friend,”Yes, it’s true. Too bad, get over it.”


62 posted on 11/26/2008 3:20:16 PM PST by mcswan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sushiman

All your taco stands are belong to us.


63 posted on 11/26/2008 3:21:53 PM PST by RedRedRose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reflex; sushiman

You said — “Santa Anna traded Texas off to save his sorry butt from Texian firing squad or worse ,after he was caught in a womans dress trying to escape the fight at San Jacinto....”

Sam Houston was never going to put Santa Anna in front of a firing squad. History tells us that was *never* the intention of Sam Houston, and so that would not have happened in any case. You see..., Santa Anna was about 100 times more valuable *alive* than he *ever* would have been “dead” — because Santa Anna was *also* President of Mexico and had the authority to conclude such an agreement — a very good reason to keep him alive... LOL...


64 posted on 11/26/2008 3:23:28 PM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: raptor29
try not to hold back how you really feel about this issue. Using euphemism innuendos do not clearly communicate your true feelings.

If you want to know how I feel about this (and others) issue; please read my tag line.

65 posted on 11/26/2008 3:32:38 PM PST by dirtymac (Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country. Really! It's time; NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: sushiman

I wish Bush would march the army down South and take Baja before he leaves office. We could call it New Bushland. There is plenty of time left to do it and we need lots more beach condo space and places to fish.
Who would stop us there, huh?


66 posted on 11/26/2008 3:33:16 PM PST by RedRedRose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedRedRose

Putin would be enraged and perhaps murder a few journalists in his rage. Hugo Chavez’ veins on his face would approach the bursting point and a few peasants nearby would mysteriously disappear. And the Libs heads would explode. Other than that, there would be little reaction.


67 posted on 11/26/2008 3:40:36 PM PST by webschooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: TenthAmendmentChampion
...slightly north of Mexico City as U.S troops under the command of General Winfield Scott were occupying Mexico City.

I was going to write that the cities of Scottsdale,AZ and Winfield, KS were both named for this individual, but a quick search showed that it was an entirely different Winfield Scott that they were named for.

Never mind.

68 posted on 11/26/2008 3:41:22 PM PST by TotusTuus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mcswan

Don’t forget France. They managed to rule part of Mexico for a while as did the Dutch if I remember correctly.


69 posted on 11/26/2008 3:43:11 PM PST by farfromhome (Let us judge Obama on the content of his character rather than on the color of his skin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: sushiman

New Spain stole it from Old Spain... who stole it from native Americans. Thus, Mexico was born. From there, it was purchased by USA.


70 posted on 11/26/2008 3:48:43 PM PST by exhaustedmomma (Way to go BARNEY!! Barney for White House Press Secretary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: webschooner

Sounds good to me. Let’s roll.


71 posted on 11/26/2008 3:48:58 PM PST by RedRedRose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
1. Texas was filled by Americans whom the Mexican government invited because it couldn't settle northern Mexico and protect against Indians. When the Mexicans under Santa Anna changed the constitution to prohibit slavery, but also to install Santa Anna as dictator, the Texicans revolted and won independence. So Texas is completely a self-imposed wound.

2. Arizona, California, and New Mexico were spoils of war after Mexican soldiers killed Americans north of the Rio Grande (after Texas became a state in 1844). Mexicans were clearly in violation of the border; had been warned; and were so pompous and arrogant that they thought they would be in New Orleans in two weeks. Santa Anna promised to march through Washington.

Tell your friend to read something besides Howard Zinn's leftist tripe.

72 posted on 11/26/2008 4:07:27 PM PST by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually." (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sushiman

the arabs, africans, d and other countries ran the slave trade in africa


73 posted on 11/26/2008 4:12:50 PM PST by machogirl (when the call comes at 3:00 am, Bill Ayers answers the phone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: dirtymac

I’m right there with you, Mac. And I live here in southern California, so I’ve seen enough of this mess out here. Illegal immigration is just another national issue that everyone dances around, no one willing to tell the truth for fear of being labeled a racist, or some other kind of ‘basher’. Well, screw them, I couldn’t care less and their name-calling has run its course. And the more people in our country who say ‘screw it’, the better off we’ll be.


74 posted on 11/26/2008 4:21:01 PM PST by raptor29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: sushiman
My left-wing radical friend insists we stole all this land from Mexico.

Ask your friend this:
Less than 10,000 soldiers with single-shot rifles march from Veracruz
(meeting NO resistance at the beachhead), defeat multiple armies
along the road (in some easily defensible terrain)...
and takes AND HOLDS a city of about 1,000,000.

And this is just replay of what happened centuries earlier
with Cortez.

Is the territory REALLY an actual country?

I'm not dissing Mexicans in general.
But good G-d, the inability to organize sure seems to be a hallmark.
They are lucky to have a USA to invade.
And to provide them a chance at decent living!!!

As one TV commentator said: If we hadn't obtained some of Mexico's
northern territories...
we'd have Mexicans breaking into the USA by coming into Nebraska.
(Because the Mexican guvmint wouldn't have known what to do with
the area taken over by the USA)
75 posted on 11/26/2008 4:21:08 PM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sushiman; LS

See #72 - from resident FR history expert.


76 posted on 11/26/2008 4:46:23 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun

Thanks for the history lesson guys and gals . I knew I could count on Freepers to come through . I have sent a long email to my buddy . Can’t wait to read his reply !

My best to you all !


77 posted on 11/26/2008 5:18:56 PM PST by sushiman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: LS
The early Texas settlers from the US were called Texians not Texicans.
78 posted on 11/26/2008 5:22:53 PM PST by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: sushiman

Yes, in exactly the same way the Mexicans stole it from the Indians, who stole it from different Indians....

Why choose this particular change of ownership to start trying to apply that kind of logic? Do your friends want to roll back all the boundaries of European and Asian countries to the middle ages? If so, why stop there? Why not even earlier?


79 posted on 11/26/2008 5:23:24 PM PST by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sushiman

You can not argue with these people. I always say ; “ your right, Let’s give it back to the native Americans and let them vote if they want to be part of the US or Mexico.”


80 posted on 11/26/2008 5:33:45 PM PST by Kid Shelleen (Barack the Messiah: Never in the field of US politics have so many waited so long for so little.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-106 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson