Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Duke sues insurer over lacrosse settlement
Raleigh News & Observer ^ | November 25, 2008 | Anne Blythe

Posted on 11/25/2008 3:19:23 PM PST by abb

Duke University is suing its insurance company for refusing to pay any of the settlement costs for the Duke lacrosse case.

In federal court papers filed Monday, Duke is seeking financial relief from National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh, an affiliate of insurance giant AIG.

The case stems from gang-rape allegations that an escort service dancer lodged against three players after a lacrosse team party in June 2006.

Before all the facts were gathered and any criminal charges were filed, Duke suspended the lacrosse team's season.

The criminal case against the three players crumbled quickly over the next year.

In April 2007, State Attorney General Roy Cooper dismissed all charges against the three and declared that there was no evidence of an assault at the party.

In June 2007, Duke entered a settlement agreement with the three players. Neither side has disclosed the terms of the settlement.

"Duke believes that our insurance companies should meet their obligations, and we will pursue all options available to us," Michael Schoenfeld, vice president for public affairs and government relations at Duke, said in a statement.

"While Duke sought to address this without resorting to a lawsuit, we were not able to reach a satisfactory outcome and thus turn to the courts."

anne.blythe@newsobserver.com or (919) 932-8741


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: duke; dukelax; dukeu; durham; lawsuit; nifong
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
This just in.
1 posted on 11/25/2008 3:19:23 PM PST by abb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: abner; Alia; beyondashadow; Bitter Bierce; bjc; Bogeygolfer; BossLady; Brytani; bwteim; Carling; ..

ping


2 posted on 11/25/2008 3:20:12 PM PST by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

Duke screws up and an insturance company pays the bill? The government should have used this for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.


3 posted on 11/25/2008 3:21:47 PM PST by Melchior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

“The criminal case against the three players crumbled quickly over the next year.”

They have a different definition of “quickly” than me.


4 posted on 11/25/2008 3:23:13 PM PST by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

So the insured gets to choose to accept liability, negotiate the price of their liability, then just bill the insurance company. I can see where the insurance company might not be happy about that. On the other hand it is very common for insurance companies to settle with plaintiffs against the wishes of their clients.


5 posted on 11/25/2008 3:24:49 PM PST by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Melchior

Well, we kinda sorta did exactly that. You and I were the insurance company!!! If only I could find the contract I signed where you and I actually AGREED to take on that responsibility.


6 posted on 11/25/2008 3:25:03 PM PST by willgolfforfood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: abb

This case should be interesting. Incompetent liberal institution that spends gov’t dollars vs. nicompetent conservative institution that gets bailed out with gov’t dollars.


7 posted on 11/25/2008 3:25:26 PM PST by mlocher (USA is a sovereign nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb
In April 2007, State Attorney General Roy Cooper dismissed all charges against the three and declared that there was no evidence of an assault at the party.

BS! Cooper declared them INNOCENT!

8 posted on 11/25/2008 3:25:30 PM PST by thesetruths
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb
AIG cant afford to pay, screw Duke!


9 posted on 11/25/2008 3:28:16 PM PST by OCC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeeSharp; abb

I’d suspect that the carrier already sent a reservation of rights letter in the event they agreed to defend Duke in any litigation. but the article says Duke into into the settlement, not the carrier. If AIG wasnt actually part of the settlement agreement, they shouldnt have to pay it.


10 posted on 11/25/2008 3:30:05 PM PST by Canedawg (The media is a ass, a idiot.," said Mr. Bumble.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: abb

Make Jesse Jackson open his pockets...


11 posted on 11/25/2008 3:37:29 PM PST by Dallas59 (Not My President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Canedawg

That assumes the carrier did not fail to defend or fail to indemnify.

I have no idea what the policy at issue says, but there often is some sort of libel/slander coverage under a CGL policy.

They sure as hell slandered the Hell out of these boys.


12 posted on 11/25/2008 3:38:20 PM PST by MeanWestTexan (Beware of Obama's Reichstag Fire; Don't permit him to seize emergency powers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan

They can defend with a reservation of rights. that is different from indemnifying. And Duke can afford to pay the settlements to the students if they have to.


13 posted on 11/25/2008 3:42:50 PM PST by Canedawg (The media is a ass, a idiot.," said Mr. Bumble.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan

It would be great to see the Insurance co. decide to drag Duke U. through the courts to prove the ways in which Duke officials slandered the players and in other ways violated the terms of the policy (presuming that the Insurer has good grounds for declining to pay for Duke official malfeasance and incompetence). I hope the Insurer does not settle and fights this all the way!!!


14 posted on 11/25/2008 3:43:13 PM PST by Enchante (Thanks, Mediascum, you "elected" your candidate and now the country will pay....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: All

link to text of filing

http://s1.zetaboards.com/Liestoppers_meeting/topic/901718/1/?x=50#new


15 posted on 11/25/2008 3:46:47 PM PST by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: abb

Geesh, the Nando couldn’t get the month of the party correct.


16 posted on 11/25/2008 3:46:53 PM PST by qwertypie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Canedawg

Yes, and that has no bearing on what I said in my post, at all.


17 posted on 11/25/2008 3:47:45 PM PST by MeanWestTexan (Beware of Obama's Reichstag Fire; Don't permit him to seize emergency powers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: abb
I take it Duke will now file for a federal bail out of about $850 billion to pay off the settlement and give them some "financial flexibility" to avoid bankruptcy.
18 posted on 11/25/2008 3:50:08 PM PST by RetiredArmy (NOTE TO REPUBLICAN POLITICIANS: PLAY THE CONSERVATIVE CARD!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

It doesn’t work that way.

For duty-to-defend, you look at the 4 corners of the insurance policy and the 4 cornders of the Complaint, and see if there are any covered claims. If one is covered, the carrier defends the whole thing.

For indemnity, you look at the facts. Here, Duke was negligent in its allegations, which is exactly the kind of thing insurance pays for.

I am a business owner in a high-risk buiness. Lots of deaths, blow outs, pollution. I’ve sued (and won) against insurance companies that simply won’t honor their contract.

Now, keep in mind I have no love for Duke or what they did.

I just happen to know that insurance companies don’t make any money paying claims and are in the business of denying claims because that’s how they make money.


19 posted on 11/25/2008 3:51:51 PM PST by MeanWestTexan (Beware of Obama's Reichstag Fire; Don't permit him to seize emergency powers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Enchante
I hope the Insurer does not settle and fights this all the way!!!

I hope so too, the insurance company seems to have a compelling defense.

20 posted on 11/25/2008 3:52:58 PM PST by pray4liberty (Always vote for life!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson