Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Billions of Positrons Created in Laboratory (anti-matter!)
Centauri Dreams ^ | 11/18/08

Posted on 11/18/2008 1:23:54 PM PST by LibWhacker


Irradiate a millimeter-thick gold target with the right kind of laser and you might get a surprise in the form of 100 billion positrons, the antimatter equivalent of electrons. Researchers had been studying the process at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, where they used thin targets that produced far fewer positrons. The new laser method came about through simulations that showed a thicker target was more effective.

And suddenly lasers and antimatter are again making news. Hui Chen is the Livermore scientist behind this work:

“We’ve detected far more anti-matter than anyone else has ever measured in a laser experiment. We’ve demonstrated the creation of a significant number of positrons using a short-pulse laser.”

Image: Physicist Hui Chen sets up targets for the antimatter experiment at the Jupiter laser facility. Credit: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.

What’s happening here is that ionized electrons are interacting with gold nuclei, giving off energy that decays into matter and antimatter. It’s a method that has been studied before at Livermore, using the laboratory’s petawatt laser. An article by physicist Michael Perry explains the interactions that laser achieved, first produced about a decade ago:

The intense beam of Livermore’s Petawatt laser was powerful enough to break up atoms by causing reactions in their nuclei. Accelerated by the laser, electrons traveling at nearly the speed of light collided with nuclei in a gold foil target, producing gamma rays that knocked out some of the neutrons from other gold nuclei and caused the gold to decay into elements such as platinum. Gamma rays also zoomed in on a layer of uranium sitting behind the gold and split uranium nuclei into lighter elements. Before the Petawatt, all of these effects had been solely in the domain of particle accelerators or nuclear reactors.

Accelerated to energies exceeding 100 megaelectronvolts, the electrons in the gold targets produced high-energy x rays. These in turn decayed into pairs of electrons and their antimatter counterparts, positrons, in such large numbers as to possibly generate an electron-positron plasma, never before created in the laboratory. An intense beam of protons also turned up. Not only was the Petawatt the most powerful laser in the world, but, unexpectedly, it also was a powerful ion accelerator.

The petawatt laser was decommissioned in mid-1999. Its original development centered on the study of inertial confinement fusion, in which a pellet of fuel could be ignited through intense laser bombardment. Variations on inertial confinement fusion play interestingly through interstellar propulsion studies, including the massive Daedalus probe designed by the British Interplanetary Society, which would have used deuterium and helium-3 as its fodder for a trip to Barnard’s Star.

But the petawatt laser also opened up the possibility of using a laser to do things particle accelerators had been called upon to do in the past. And now we’ve moved significantly beyond the earlier results — the petawatt experimenters detected roughly 100 antimatter particles compared to Chen’s one million. And note this: Chen’s number refers to particles that were directly detected, a result that produces an overall estimate of 100 billion positrons produced in the entire experiment.

We’ve looked in these pages at the possibility of harvesting naturally forming antimatter found in our own Solar System, even near the Earth, where cosmic ray interactions with the upper atmosphere produce small quantities. And the presence of antimatter near the center of our galaxy has been established, detectable because matter/antimatter annihilation produces gamma rays. The trick has always been that harvesting antimatter — or producing it in accelerators — yields small amounts at great expense. The latest work at least offers hope for more robust laboratory study of a material whose propulsive properties have long attracted interstellar theorists.

Just how significant a step this is remains to be seen, but I note what Peter Beiersdorfer, who works with Chen at Livermore, has to say:

“We’ve entered a new era. Now, that we’ve looked for it, it’s almost like it hit us right on the head. We envision a center for antimatter research, using lasers as cheaper antimatter factories.”

We’ll know more shortly, for Chen is presenting her work at the American Physical Society’s Division of Plasma Physics meeting that runs through Friday this week. A Livermore news release is available.


TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: antihydrogen; antimatter; created; laboratory; positrons; stringtheory
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
Interstellar space travel, here we come!
1 posted on 11/18/2008 1:23:55 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: SunkenCiv; blam

some cosmology news


3 posted on 11/18/2008 1:33:13 PM PST by Kevmo (Palin/Hunter 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

4 posted on 11/18/2008 1:36:11 PM PST by aWolverine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Is this the mysterious and unexpected production of possibly dark matter they just got at Livermore? Doesn’t sound like it.


5 posted on 11/18/2008 1:37:58 PM PST by RightWhale (Exxon Suxx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

6 posted on 11/18/2008 1:38:14 PM PST by aWolverine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: springtime4hillary

SWEET!


7 posted on 11/18/2008 1:42:32 PM PST by wolfcreek (I see miles and miles of Texas....let's keep it that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

What about power generation on Earth?


8 posted on 11/18/2008 1:42:48 PM PST by Hoosier-Daddy ("It does no good to be a super power if you have to worry what the neighbors think." BuffaloJack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

This is much cooler than the Scotch tape, x-ray thingy.


9 posted on 11/18/2008 1:44:08 PM PST by wolfcreek (I see miles and miles of Texas....let's keep it that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

Wouldn’t that be something, dark matter AND copious quantities of anti-matter in the same experiment?


10 posted on 11/18/2008 1:44:54 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Hoosier-Daddy

Yep, all the power we’d ever need — at least while we’re still a Type 0 civilization.


11 posted on 11/18/2008 1:47:13 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Don’t know, but Haul Parvey had an article this morning about how they got some new kinds of particles and not in the main beam.


12 posted on 11/18/2008 1:52:13 PM PST by RightWhale (Exxon Suxx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Pair production (electron-positron) is a well-understood phenomenon. I used positrons from a 22Na source as a probe for condensed matter microstructure way back in the bad old days of being a physics grad student. Making the heavier antiparticles is the the real trick. Usually the energy cost is ruinous. I think Fermilab will sell you a nanogram of anti-hydrogen for a few million dollars, all nicely entrained in a magnetic vacuum trap.
13 posted on 11/18/2008 1:53:41 PM PST by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Interstellar space travel, here we come!

Not without those dilithium crystals!

14 posted on 11/18/2008 2:01:06 PM PST by JimRed ("Hey, hey, Teddy K., how many girls did you drown today?" TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Are positrons what allowed the creation of Positraction?


15 posted on 11/18/2008 2:03:54 PM PST by B Knotts (ConservatismCentral.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hoosier-Daddy
What about power generation on Earth?

Well, One, lets hope they can find something other than gold to turn into anti-matter. And two, how are you going to capture and store it. Last I heard, you needed some sort of magnetic containment to keep it all from smashing into matter and obliterating both. And that would require lots of power. And that doesn't count the power used for making the stuff.

Warp drive? Not any time soon.

16 posted on 11/18/2008 2:08:16 PM PST by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Hoosier-Daddy
"What about power generation on Earth?"

That would never work. We are going to need all the gold to satisfy the gold bugs desire to return to the barter community of hard currency. If we use the gold to generate anti-matter and keep warm, the goldbugs will go insane.

17 posted on 11/18/2008 2:14:27 PM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: chimera
   Fermilab will sell you a nanogram of anti-hydrogen for a few million dollars, all nicely entrained in a magnetic vacuum trap.

  Years from now, we'll look at some old invoices and say - 'Wow! I can't believe I used to pay 2.5 trillion dollars for a milligram of anti-hydrogen!'
18 posted on 11/18/2008 2:34:54 PM PST by Maurice Tift (You can't stop the signal, Mal. You can never stop the signal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo; AdmSmith; bvw; callisto; ckilmer; dandelion; ganeshpuri89; gobucks; KevinDavis; ...
Thanks Kevmo! of interest to the list...

19 posted on 11/18/2008 5:23:02 PM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______Profile finally updated Saturday, October 11, 2008 !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Yeah, sure.


20 posted on 11/18/2008 11:07:39 PM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson