1 posted on
11/17/2008 9:03:13 AM PST by
BGHater
To: SunkenCiv
FR family ping.
2 posted on
11/17/2008 9:04:23 AM PST by
BGHater
(The GOP, the new DNC.)
To: BGHater
And, amazingly, they all managed to vote in Ohio’s election earlier this month.
To: BGHater
Were they perhaps the victims of a violent Gay pride rally?
4 posted on
11/17/2008 9:16:20 AM PST by
erkyl
(The hottest places in hell are reserved for those who, in a period of moral crisis, stay neutral)
To: StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; 1ofmanyfree; 21twelve; 24Karet; 2ndDivisionVet; 31R1O; ...
6 posted on
11/17/2008 9:18:59 AM PST by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______Profile finally updated Saturday, October 11, 2008 !!!)
To: BGHater
Hmmm.... I’d be careful trying to compare these people to what we consider the modern nuclear family.
As was the case throughout most of human history, they probably lived in a multi-generational family setting, with three or more generations (including widowed aunts, bachelor uncles and infirm grandparents) living close by.
The post WWII nuclear family of mom, dad and the kids is a historical anomaly.
7 posted on
11/17/2008 9:20:23 AM PST by
Citizen Blade
(What would Ronald Reagan do?)
To: BGHater
analysis revealed the researchers were a mother, father and their two sonsA family of stone-age researchers. Remarkable.
To: BGHater
10 posted on
11/17/2008 9:22:25 AM PST by
Fido969
("The hardest thing in the world to understand is income tax." - Albert Einstein)
To: BGHater
Several bodies also had defence injuries to the forearms and hands. What does this tell you?
11 posted on
11/17/2008 9:25:00 AM PST by
bmwcyle
(McCain had no honor when he failed to defend Sarah Palin, Leno was no enough)
To: BGHater
Mr. and Mrs. Barney Rubble and Bam Bam. Second son was cut from TV show due to time contraints.
16 posted on
11/17/2008 9:37:43 AM PST by
Ciexyz
To: BGHater
I'm somewhat confused by some of the comments made within this article. The article suggests that this is a one of a kind find, stating that "this is a particularly significant find because it is the first time we can conclusively prove a family has been buried together." It goes on to state that previous graves were mass graves.
However, when discussing the position of the bodies, the article points out that it was unusual for children to be positioned facing the parents during that time.
To me, that suggests that finding the families buried together is not unique, but that the positioning of the children is.
Maybe this is the oldest found nuclear from Germany or Europe, rather than the world.
20 posted on
11/17/2008 10:27:19 AM PST by
GOPyouth
("But we've got to have AIDS to pee in her eye socket!" - Beary Bear)
To: BGHater
Buried or STEPPED ON while sleeping?
21 posted on
11/17/2008 12:06:17 PM PST by
wolfcreek
(I see miles and miles of Texas....let's keep it that way.)
To: BGHater
Wait...I have a few questions:
1)Did ACORN registered them to vote, yet?
2)Are you sure they were married? They could be 'living in sin'!!
3)Did anyone know where Clinton's relatives were back 4600 years ago?
To: BGHater
26 posted on
11/17/2008 11:36:53 PM PST by
Bellflower
(A Brand New Day Is Coming!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson