Skip to comments.
Buried in each other's arms:Scientists discover remains of world's most ancient nuclear family
Daily Mail ^
| 17 Nov 2008
| Daily Mail
Posted on 11/17/2008 9:03:13 AM PST by BGHater
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
1
posted on
11/17/2008 9:03:13 AM PST
by
BGHater
To: SunkenCiv
FR family ping.
2
posted on
11/17/2008 9:04:23 AM PST
by
BGHater
(The GOP, the new DNC.)
To: BGHater
And, amazingly, they all managed to vote in Ohio’s election earlier this month.
To: BGHater
Were they perhaps the victims of a violent Gay pride rally?
4
posted on
11/17/2008 9:16:20 AM PST
by
erkyl
(The hottest places in hell are reserved for those who, in a period of moral crisis, stay neutral)
To: BGHater
The Simpsons? The Jetsons? The Einsteins?
5
posted on
11/17/2008 9:17:01 AM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______Profile finally updated Saturday, October 11, 2008 !!!)
To: StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; 1ofmanyfree; 21twelve; 24Karet; 2ndDivisionVet; 31R1O; ...
6
posted on
11/17/2008 9:18:59 AM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______Profile finally updated Saturday, October 11, 2008 !!!)
To: BGHater
Hmmm.... I’d be careful trying to compare these people to what we consider the modern nuclear family.
As was the case throughout most of human history, they probably lived in a multi-generational family setting, with three or more generations (including widowed aunts, bachelor uncles and infirm grandparents) living close by.
The post WWII nuclear family of mom, dad and the kids is a historical anomaly.
7
posted on
11/17/2008 9:20:23 AM PST
by
Citizen Blade
(What would Ronald Reagan do?)
To: BGHater
analysis revealed the researchers were a mother, father and their two sonsA family of stone-age researchers. Remarkable.
To: Citizen Blade
The article said testing done on the remains indicate they were related as mother, father, and sons. But the article did agree with your assertion that we mustn’t assume this was the norm.
9
posted on
11/17/2008 9:22:19 AM PST
by
erkyl
(The hottest places in hell are reserved for those who, in a period of moral crisis, stay neutral)
To: BGHater
10
posted on
11/17/2008 9:22:25 AM PST
by
Fido969
("The hardest thing in the world to understand is income tax." - Albert Einstein)
To: BGHater
Several bodies also had defence injuries to the forearms and hands. What does this tell you?
11
posted on
11/17/2008 9:25:00 AM PST
by
bmwcyle
(McCain had no honor when he failed to defend Sarah Palin, Leno was no enough)
To: bmwcyle
No Heckler & Koch back then?
12
posted on
11/17/2008 9:26:36 AM PST
by
BGHater
(The GOP, the new DNC.)
To: BGHater
13
posted on
11/17/2008 9:28:04 AM PST
by
bmwcyle
(McCain had no honor when he failed to defend Sarah Palin, Leno was no enough)
To: erkyl
The article said testing done on the remains indicate they were related as mother, father, and sons. But the article did agree with your assertion that we mustnt assume this was the norm. I think it makes sense to bury a family unit like that together, especially if they were all killed at the same time by raiders or bandits or whatever. I think that's a natural response for any society. I'd guess their surviving tribesmen buried these people after the attack.
14
posted on
11/17/2008 9:29:15 AM PST
by
Citizen Blade
(What would Ronald Reagan do?)
To: Fido969
look for Prop 8 loony opponents to come stomp on them now.
15
posted on
11/17/2008 9:29:22 AM PST
by
WOBBLY BOB
(ACORN:American Corruption for Obama Right Now)
To: BGHater
Mr. and Mrs. Barney Rubble and Bam Bam. Second son was cut from TV show due to time contraints.
16
posted on
11/17/2008 9:37:43 AM PST
by
Ciexyz
To: WOBBLY BOB
Some times stompers become stompees your sticks please.
17
posted on
11/17/2008 9:38:26 AM PST
by
Vaduz
To: KingSnorky
Thankfully ACORN really does represent the unrepresented like this family
18
posted on
11/17/2008 9:41:28 AM PST
by
wrhssaxensemble
(Piyush "Bobby" Jindal in 2012 after Obama makes an even bigger mess of everything)
To: Citizen Blade
By definition, the nuclear family is mother/father. Relatives beyond that aren't nuclear, they are peripheral to the central grouping. Extended family groupings that include aunts uncles, cousins etc are clan groups.
The fact that these people were buried together like this suggests that this culture consciously separated the nuclear family from the rest of the group. Pretty neat but I would guess nuclear families as the human norm are at least 10,000 years old.
19
posted on
11/17/2008 9:57:42 AM PST
by
Varda
To: BGHater
I'm somewhat confused by some of the comments made within this article. The article suggests that this is a one of a kind find, stating that "this is a particularly significant find because it is the first time we can conclusively prove a family has been buried together." It goes on to state that previous graves were mass graves.
However, when discussing the position of the bodies, the article points out that it was unusual for children to be positioned facing the parents during that time.
To me, that suggests that finding the families buried together is not unique, but that the positioning of the children is.
Maybe this is the oldest found nuclear from Germany or Europe, rather than the world.
20
posted on
11/17/2008 10:27:19 AM PST
by
GOPyouth
("But we've got to have AIDS to pee in her eye socket!" - Beary Bear)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson