Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Amityschild

Well, I’m not sure this is an admission of anything, since it’s a comment on Fight the Smears linking to FactCheck.org, and Obama could argue that his handlers or his pals at FactCheck got it wrong.

But it still leaves us with the UNDENIABLE FACT that Obama refuses to produce his real birth certificate.

He should not be recognized as the constitutionally legitimate President of the United States until he produces real, hard, properly certified evidence of natural born citizenship. There are too many doubts here to let him off the hook. Let’s see the original vault certificate, a current COLB duly released by the Hawaii authorities, and records from the three universities he attended showing what he said his citizenship was when he applied to their programs. Also his passport records.

All of this would certainly be demanded by the press if he were a Republican. Hundreds of pages of National Guard records were not enough for Bush. Five hundred pages of medical records were not enough for McCain. But clinton, Obama, and Biden never released their basic medical records, and nothing is said.

Well, that is arguable. But proof of natural born citizenship when grave doubts have been legitimately raised must be insisted on if he is to assume the presidency. WHAT IS SO SECRET ABOUT A BIRTH CERTIFICATE? Everyone is obliged to show it in order to get a passport or a driver’s license, or to receive a security clearance, or to enter the military.

There is plenty of evidence that Obama’s COLBs posted on the net, and more recently his certificate of registration for the draft, are crude forgeries. That is even more reason wny he must not be sworn into office until he has coughed up undeniable proof that he is qualified. And that doesn’t mean just another fake COLB produced on-line the day before the inauguration.


47 posted on 11/15/2008 9:09:51 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Cicero

“All of this would certainly be demanded by the press if he were a Republican.”

No kidding - look at how they continue to skewer Sarah. Yesterday I read an article that she was seen in Florida with shorts that were inappropriately short!


60 posted on 11/15/2008 9:19:46 AM PST by JavaJumpy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: Cicero
All of this would certainly be demanded by the press if he were a Republican.

It was.
The left demanded McCain show his proof of citizenship and he did. McCains parents, both U.S. citizens in the military, were not in the U.S. when he was born. The left was trying to nail him.

So, why won't Oboma do the same? It's easy, and it's free! Why try to fight 12 legal battles over it?

61 posted on 11/15/2008 9:23:21 AM PST by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: Cicero; Amityschild; MHGinTN; DakotaGator; HighlyOpinionated; Gemsbok; cripplecreek

“But proof of natural born citizenship when grave doubts have been legitimately raised must be insisted on...”

Plan to hand deliver this letter Monday and consult with the rep at my senator’s local office. Will invite family members in other states to do likewise. Looking for ideas on how to expand this concept among Republicans in each state.

Dear Senator _________:

Many American voters believe the United States may be the victim of an on-going, massive fraud of historical proportion.

Specifically, President-Elect Obama by his actions alleges he is a natural born citizen. Amazingly, even when challenged in court, he has not provided evidence of that fact.

If Obama is not a natural born citizen, merely asking him to provide evidence of his place of birth will be ineffective. He can be expected to present a level of evidence that simply shifts the burden of proof. In this regard, he may be sworn into office before such evidence can be thoroughly examined and disproved.

Rather, we ask you to request the Republican Party to research the statutes and case law concerning the issue, to take the statements of government officials that have knowledge of relevant facts, to conduct an investigation of government records and to obtain and examine all evidence wherever it may be lawfully obtained. This would include, but not be limited to evidence of Obama’s place of birth, his mother’s passport stampings, any adult citizenship in foreign countries, passport applications, applications to appear as an attorney before state and federal bars, any communications with the Selective Service Board as well as any other declarations or statements made to any state or federal agency.

If warranted by the results of such investigation, we ask that you consult and coordinate with other Republicans as to the form of any challenge prior to January 6, 2009 deemed appropriate. If no pre-January 6 action is thought appropriate, we ask that you join in a plan with other Republican Senators and Representatives to present an objection to Obama’s election during the January 6 Joint Session of Congress..

Some American voters will be disappointed if Obama is constitutionally disqualified and there may be unrest. Such unrest will be the lesser of the potential evils.

We realize the enormity of such an undertaking; however, defending the Constitution is the duty of each American. It is especially the duty of those who serve in uniform and those who serve as our elected politicians.

Thank you for your work.


104 posted on 11/15/2008 9:55:00 AM PST by frog in a pot (Is there a definition of "domestic enemies" as used in federal oaths, or is that just lip service?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson