Posted on 11/15/2008 8:48:13 AM PST by Amityschild
OBAMA ADMITS HE WAS A BRITISH CITIZEN "AT BIRTH" - AS SUCH, OBAMA IS NOT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES
Barack Obama's official web site, Fight The Smears, admits he was a British Citizen at birth. At the very bottom of the section of his web site that shows an alleged official Certification Of Live Birth, the web site lists the following information and link thereto: FactCheck.org Clarifies Barack’s Citizenship
“When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.
Since Sen. Obama has neither renounced his U.S. citizenship nor sworn an oath of allegiance to Kenya, his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired on Aug. 4,1982.”
That is a direct admission Barack Obama was a British citizen "at birth".
(Excerpt) Read more at blogtext.org ...
What the Hawai''i officials have so far NOT stated is that Obama was born in Honolulu. Nor have they confirmed that the images of a COLB that Obama has presented bear accurate representations of the facts on his birth, as they are officially recorded.
Why do they have such records for people not born in the state? Simple -- to allow the parents to register babies born while overseas, while out of Hawaii.
Yes, Hawa'ii seems enjoy having apostrophes along with it. Ma'halo!
When did they release his original birth certificate? All they've released so far is his adoptive certificate when he was two years old. The real birth records are still in lock up.
So how do you know he was born here? Where did you get the info? I'd like to see it. Thanks.
At the time Kenya was still a British colony. Any diplomatic passport would have been issued by the UK government. So far as they were concerned, Obama senior was nothing but a goat hearder.
Why is it, NS, that the Kingdom isn’t responding to say that Obama’s birth legend as he claims it MATCHES those original birth certificates? What do you think?
I don’t see anything in that statement that negates the claim that he is a natural born US citizen. In fact, just the opposite, it says he was born in the United States presumably to his American mother, who I think we can assume, was present at the birth.
My point is that this dog won’t hunt and maybe it’s time we started paying attention to real issues.
Article II contains no Section 8. Can you be a little more specific please?
If you have looked over some of the bazillion posts on this subject then you’d know that I was the first to suggest that he might have multiple citizenship’s.
This admission of British citizenship is entirely new, and matches what I have previously tried to alert everyone to.
But just for the record here are his possible citizenship’s British, Kenyan, Indonesian, and finally American, and quite frankly any one with that many claims to various citizenship’s around the world certainly isn’t the type of person our founding fathers wanted as the president when they wrote article 2.
The state of Hawaii has stated for the record that it has Obama's birth certificate on file. What more do you want them to do?
It came late in the campaign. The Obama admission about his Kenyan citizenship was added to Obama's "Fight the Smears" website 2 weeks before the November 4th election.
How about in the link I provided in reply 139?
I watched the memorial service for Madelyn Dunham last night and as it was ending the Mistress of Ceremonies made a rather odd statement along the lines of, “Madelyn took her responsibilities to heart, along with her job, she also raised these two native children of these islands...” Considering that Maya was born in Jakarta, Indonesia that is a more than odd statement to make.
Well DOH, I think there are about 300 million "persons" who do have a damn tangible interest in your precious "vital record"
No, they are not. A natural born citizen is one who is a citizen at birth, and where that child is born is immaterial.
It's the citizenship of the parents that makes a child natural born citizen.
Law of Nations [referenced in Article 1, Section 8, Clause 10 of the US Constitution]
CHAP. XIX.
OF OUR NATIVE COUNTRY, AND SEVERAL THINGS THAT RELATE TO IT.
§ 215. Children of citizens born in a foreign country.
It is asked whether the children born of citizens in a foreign country are citizens? The laws have decided this question in several countries, and their regulations must be followed.(59) By the law of nature alone, children follow the condition of their fathers, and enter into all their rights; the place of birth produces no change in this particular, and cannot, of itself, furnish any reason for taking from a child what nature has given him; I say "of itself," for, civil or political laws may, for particular reasons, ordain otherwise. But I suppose that the father has not entirely quitted his country in order to settle elsewhere. If he has fixed his abode in a foreign country, he is become a member of another society, at least as a perpetual inhabitant; and his children will be members of it also.
----
McCain was not born in a military hospital, he was born outside the Canal Zone in Colon, Panama. Both his parents were US citizens, so he is a natural born citizen.
In April 2008 the US Senate approved a resolution affirming McCain's status.
At the time Kenya was still a British colony. Any diplomatic passport would have been issued by the UK government. So far as they were concerned, Obama senior was nothing but a goat hearder
That is a supposition on your part, prove it as you always like to say.
Your interest ends at the answer to the question, is Barack Obama Constitutionally eligible to be president of the United States? The government of the state of Hawaii has confirmed that he is.
|
Yes. They probably do have his original birth certificate. There's no doubt his mother would have brought it with her from Kenya for hospital records. It's in lock up. They very well could have seen it. That doesn't mean it's a U.S. birth certificate.
All this says is that they have the original. We want to know where that original came from. The rest is just paperwork. A live certificate of birth , and an adoptive certificate just doesn't prove anything.
Get it now?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.