I don't find it threatening at all. Just a nuisance.Apparently that makes the majority of Californians “conservative.”
Did you mean to say “So Deeply Disgusting”?
...why don’t you go ask the BLACK OBAMA SUPPORTERS why they voted “yes” on prop 8?
Why does the libs find gay behavoir so cheerishable???
I am sicked and tired of these mentally illed libs. If I were the president I would throw all of them out and make them live in Iran.
Sodom and Gomorrah
Are conservatives next supposed to admit they erred when they thought thieves should go to jail.
There is not a civilization yet that has survived rampant homosexuality. Homosex is not the cause, but it is a symptom of a decadent society that values self-indulgence over self-sacrifice, pride over humility.
Should read...Why Do Gays Find Conservative Marriage so Deeply Threatening?
Gays can live "in each others' arms" to their hearts content. They can join together and call it whatever they want and then work to pass laws that recognize their "unions" to be on par with marriage. Gays only want to use the word "marriage" in order to DESTROY the institution of marriage.
Why do the homos need “marriage” so much?
Have they learned nothing from straight people? These days over half of marriages end in divorce, I’m sad to say. I’d wager with gay people that number could approach 80%.
If they really knew what was good for them, they would covet each other’s asses without the burden of lawyers and alimony.
One word: ADOPTION
The denial that there even IS a “gay agenda” makes this whole puff piece unworthy of the time it would take to read it or to respond further than this.
They have goals they would like to accomplish. And they’d rather accomplish them in the courts than by building any consensus in this country. That is why there is the hissy fit about losing the argument “to conservative politics” at a time when liberals took the election by storm. It isn’t “just” conservatives who disagreed with the homosexual proponents. That is, unless the author is willing to concede that the whole nation (including all ares of California) is more socially conservative than Hollywood tries to portray it.
Shouldn't there be human-plant marriages, too?
“Why Do Liberals Need to Discuss Their Sex Lives In Public?”
“So, having established the value of gay marriage, why are people so opposed to it?”
Because if you don’t say you are in favor of it, you are harrassed, your churches are attacked and vandalized, you get assaulted, you get called a bigot and violator of civil rights, and you are forced from your job (the theater director in Sacramento being the first example).
Stopped reading right there, the lying moron accuses us of doing what the left was always guilty of.
I don't find it threatening at all. Just a nuisance.Why do people think that Homosexuality is a Civil Rights issue? It has pretty successfully hung its hat in the Black American Struggle, but it really doesn’t belong there.
Why is it that people with Anger Management Problems, Alcoholism, Drug Addition, or any other set of vices,(yes, I said vices) should not have special laws made for them because of their vices.
I mean special laws because Self Designated Homosexuals, as all homosexuals are, are entitled to marriage just like any other citizen. They are just not entitled to special, historically unlawful marriages. Just like Alcoholics are not entitled to rob little old ladies of their purses to get money for their next bottle. etc. You see, alcoholism is a problem that some people are ‘born with’ also.
Actually there is some discomfort with some gays who want the freedom to be bi, and don’t want to be considered “born” any certain way, but that would undermine the Civil Rights Angle, wouldn’t it.
'nuff said!
Well, I liked the one where he “refutes” the view that marriage is the union between a man and a woman by asking the question, “Who says?”
Shoot. He’s got us! Let’s keep pulling the thread. WHO says rape is wrong? It’s got a hell of a lot more evolutionary benefit than gay marriage, so from the perspective of godlessness it’s a LOT more “moral” than gay marriage! WHO says murder is wrong? Don’t animals kill each other? Why shouldn’t I be able to blow my next door neighbor away for playing that crap he calls ‘music’ so loud?
WHO says marriage is between a man and a woman? Ask the question another way: when has anyone in history up to this point said that marriage was ever between a man and a man? What is the history of “gay marriage”? I came across some pro-gay articles that said “the tradition of gay marriage has been with us since the Roman Empire.” So I started looking and found a SINGLE account in Nero’s day by Seutonius.
http://cafesda.blogspot.com/2008/10/same-sex-marriage-and-roman-empire.html It isn’t exactly flattering, is it? Basically this emperor was so evil, so insane, so homicidal, and so completely depraved, that he even stooped to this kind of garbage. If this is the model for gay marriage and society, let’s put it out there: gay marriage leads to the total disaster of civilization, as evidenced by it’s first practice during the time of Nero. Nero was also a flagrant pedophile, according to Seutonius, so the least we can do is legalize the molesting of all our young boys, as well.
Restricting the definition of marriage is not “inappropriate” discrimination. As a matter of fact, the word DISCRIMINATION doesn’t even apply because there is no such thing legally, culturally, socially or linguistically as a marriage that is not between a man and a woman. Gay marriage is an invention by people of the moral caliber of Nero.
You want gay marriage? Fine. I want to kill and eat people. WHO SAYS I shouldn’t be allowed to kill and eat people? It’s certainly got more historical precedent than gay marriage, and the evidence suggests it’s less destructive for society, too.
Why do gays find traditional religious and social views so deeply threatening?